Choosing Internet NTP servers

Choosing Internet NTP servers

Post by BSG Corporati » Tue, 20 Aug 1996 04:00:00



I've built and installed xntp3.5f on a Solaris 2.4 platform.  I have three
servers which I will be using a reference stratum to support 300~500 Sun
workstations and Windows PC's.

To get the servers operating, I downloaded the list of Public NTP primary
time servers, and entered all the "open access" sites into my servers
ntp.conf file.

It has been several days now, and being a good net citizen, I'd like to
cull the list to a handfull of servers.  I've got some ideas on how to
do it, but I'd like to hear from some pro's on how they have done it.

--

Unix Systems Administrator        |
BSG Corporation                   |       "Wisconsin Escapee"
Cary, NC 27511, (919) 461-6000    |

 
 
 

Choosing Internet NTP servers

Post by Gene Schmi » Thu, 29 Aug 1996 04:00:00


        You should be net-conscious in selecting
NTP servers. It is poor form to select ALL open access
servers regardless of net distance. The best strategy
is to get a mix of 3-4 of the nearer servers (max).
You don't gain much with many servers but you do
generate unnecessary net traffic.
        Rich Schmidt, Directorate of Time, USNO


 
 
 

Choosing Internet NTP servers

Post by L. F. Sheldon, Jr » Fri, 30 Aug 1996 04:00:00



>    You should be net-conscious in selecting
> NTP servers. It is poor form to select ALL open access
> servers regardless of net distance. The best strategy
> is to get a mix of 3-4 of the nearer servers (max).
> You don't gain much with many servers but you do
> generate unnecessary net traffic.
>    Rich Schmidt, Directorate of Time, USNO


I'm not sure if this was directed to me, or if it was, if it was so
intentionally.

But I am just setting us up, and I am trying very hard not to be rude.

I have a group of 4 H-PUX machines and a Cisco 2514 router that "peer"
each other.  Each also has one stratum 1 and one stratum 2 "server"
selected from the lists--selected to be "open" and some reasonable
distance away and not already on one of my machines and respond to me.

The rest of my world (that is not a router) will look to a particular
one (or more than one as we go on down the road) of the "peer" group
for "server" service.  The routers other than the router in the group
"peer" with the router and the designated server in the group.

I hope that design meets both the letter and the intent of Rich's
(and other's) comments.

--
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
.                                                                       .
- L. F. (Larry) Sheldon, Jr.                                            -
. Unix Systems Administration                                           .
- Creighton University Computer Center-Old Gym                          -
. 2500 California Plaza                                                 .
- Omaha, Nebraska, U.S.A.  68178       We are all faced with            -

- 402 280-2254 (work)                  brilliantly disguised as         -
. 402 681-4726 (cellular)                 impossible situations.        .
- 402 977-2946 (pager)                                                  -
. 402 332-4622 (residence)                  Bits and Pieces             .
-                                                                       -
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

 
 
 

1. Using an Internet Server as your NTP server

Hello NTP users,

Scenario:
Busy setting up NTP between two Digital Alpha machines.  One is running
VMS(with tcp ware) the other Digital Unix (3.2D-1).  General consensus
seems to want to make the VMS Alpha machine the time server (It is setup
in a 5 machine VMS cluster - quite reliable)

Advice needed:
If I use one of the Internet Servers recommended for timekeeping such as
bitsy.mit.edu, utcnist.microsoft.com,etc  What will the effect be on my
host(VMS Alpha) which is acting as a client to these Internet servers
(and as a server to other hosts on my local network), if the network
congestion becomes a little heavy and my server cannot connect or
receive ntp packets or data (times out for a few minutes) from those
Internet Servers for a while.  

Also do you know what sort of impact it will in turn have on the clients
of my local host/server (such as the Dig Unix Alpha server)?

What is recommended or better? - To designate Internet servers as time
servers or rather to designate a local host on your network to keep
time.

Promise I will summarize!
Looking forward to your responses
Paulo

2. dxmail on ULTRIX

3. NTP server and NTP server backup

4. EasyCD-PhilipsCDD2000-Problem solved !

5. NT Server as NTP server and AIX box as NTP client

6. Vuescan question about TIFF compression (and hopefully my last one for awhile)

7. can AIX 5.x pull NTP time from a win2000 server with the NTP server enabled?

8. Strand on Parsytec boards

9. NTP server on the internet

10. 3 or 9 Internet NTP servers?

11. Configuring a stratum 1 server (using ntp w/o being on the Internet).

12. choosing ntp peers