Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Ron Benne » Tue, 05 Jan 1999 04:00:00



Earlier in the week the Whois database was occasionally refusing requests due
to excessive load. Had never seen that before...and now today I see this:

Internic Whois displays records from previous updates occasionally...this is
bizarre...and I even cleared the cache and tried different domains that I'd
never pulled up before. And when I press reload it sometimes display the
current record and sometimes the old record. Anyone else experience this??

Here's an example of what I mean:
(and yes I tried other domains too with similar results)

Registrant:
Hi-Q Products Inc. (YOT-DOM)
   506 North Garfield Avenue
   Alhambra, CA 91801
   US
   Domain Name: YOT.COM

   Administrative Contact:

      818-308-4400 (FAX) 818-308-4407
   Technical Contact, Zone Contact:

      817/332-5661
   Billing Contact:

      818-308-4400 (FAX) 818-308-4407

   Record last updated on 24-Dec-98.
   Record created on 01-Jan-97.
   Database last updated on 1-Jan-99 03:27:16 EST.

   Domain servers in listed order:

   NS.SPINDLE.NET               204.251.22.1
   NS1.NKN.NET                  204.0.159.30

The InterNIC Registration Services database contains ONLY
non-military and non-US Government Domains and contacts.
Other associated whois servers:
   American Registry for Internet Numbers - whois.arin.net
   European IP Address Allocations        - whois.ripe.net
   Asia Pacific IP Address Allocations    - whois.apnic.net
   US Military                            - whois.nic.mil
   US Government                          - whois.nic.gov

Press reload and the current database record is shown:

Registrant:
Hi-Q Products Inc. (YOT-DOM)
   506 North Garfield Avenue
   Alhambra, CA 91801
   US

   Domain Name: YOT.COM

   Administrative Contact:

      818-308-4400 (FAX) 818-308-4407
   Technical Contact, Zone Contact:

      817/332-5661
   Billing Contact:

      818-308-4400 (FAX) 818-308-4407

   Record last updated on 24-Dec-98.
   Record created on 01-Jan-97.
   Database last updated on 3-Jan-99 17:57:14 EST.

   Domain servers in listed order:

   NS.SPINDLE.NET               204.251.22.1
   NS1.NKN.NET                  204.0.159.30

The InterNIC Registration Services database contains ONLY
non-military and non-US Government Domains and contacts.
Other associated whois servers:
   American Registry for Internet Numbers - whois.arin.net
   European IP Address Allocations        - whois.ripe.net
   Asia Pacific IP Address Allocations    - whois.apnic.net
   US Military                            - whois.nic.mil
   US Government                          - whois.nic.gov

Press reload again and guess what comes up...the OLD RECORD!!!

I also notice the Whois updates the last two days have been quite late in the
day. Is there something wrong with Internic???

Ron Bennett

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Barry Margoli » Tue, 05 Jan 1999 04:00:00




>Internic Whois displays records from previous updates occasionally...this is
>bizarre...and I even cleared the cache and tried different domains that I'd
>never pulled up before. And when I press reload it sometimes display the
>current record and sometimes the old record. Anyone else experience this??

I don't see any difference between the two records, except that one has a
blank line between the registrant address and the "Domain Name" line.  They
have different "Database last updated" dates, but that's not specific to
the record -- that's the last time anything in the database was updated.

I believe whois.internic.net is actually multiple machines.  It used to
resolve to 4-5 addresses, depending on round-robin DNS for load balancing.
Now it resolves to a single address, so I suspect they're using something
like a LocalDirector to share the load.  So I suspect the differences
you're seeing may be due to the servers getting out of sync.

--

GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Don't bother cc'ing followups to me.

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Ron Benne » Tue, 05 Jan 1999 04:00:00


I understand what the database last updated means and figured it's running on
multiple machines. But I've never seen Whois display records from old database
updates before. Something is really screwy with Internic lately!!

And yes accuracy does matter...imagine if a record changed status and the
owner didn't realize it due to old database information being displayed...umm?

Lastly, the server load problems of last week and this weeks database sync
problems may be a sign that Internic either upgrading equipment (and getting
the bugs out) or more frightening they're experiencing major problems with
their systems...frightening considering how dependent people are on domain
names.

Ron Bennett


says...



>>Internic Whois displays records from previous updates occasionally...this is
>>bizarre...and I even cleared the cache and tried different domains that I'd
>>never pulled up before. And when I press reload it sometimes display the
>>current record and sometimes the old record. Anyone else experience this??

>I don't see any difference between the two records, except that one has a
>blank line between the registrant address and the "Domain Name" line.  They
>have different "Database last updated" dates, but that's not specific to
>the record -- that's the last time anything in the database was updated.

>I believe whois.internic.net is actually multiple machines.  It used to
>resolve to 4-5 addresses, depending on round-robin DNS for load balancing.
>Now it resolves to a single address, so I suspect they're using something
>like a LocalDirector to share the load.  So I suspect the differences
>you're seeing may be due to the servers getting out of sync.

>--

>GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
>*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
>Don't bother cc'ing followups to me.

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Terry Kenned » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00



> Lastly, the server load problems of last week and this weeks database sync
> problems may be a sign that Internic either upgrading equipment (and getting
> the bugs out) or more frightening they're experiencing major problems with
> their systems...frightening considering how dependent people are on domain
> names.

  There used to be a large number of sites abusing the WHOIS servers (I don't
know if this is still happening). One example was a very large software vendor
who did a WHOIS dip on *every* incoming FTP connection to decide if the site
in question was in the US (as a half-assed attempt at export control). When I
spoke to the InterNIC folks about this (over a year ago) they said that this
one site was responsible for several thousand WHOIS dips *per second*. And
they weren't the only ones doing it.

  WHOIS isn't really vital as a real-time service (unless it's being abused,
as in the above example). The root servers (most of which are still volun-
teer-based) are far more important, and they appear to be in good shape.

        Terry Kennedy             Operations Manager, Academic Computing

        +1 201 915 9381 (voice)   +1 201 435-3662 (FAX)

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by John Polca » Thu, 07 Jan 1999 04:00:00


On Mon, 04 Jan 1999 15:49:26 GMT, Barry Margolin


>I don't see any difference between the two records, except that one has a
>blank line between the registrant address and the "Domain Name" line.  They
>have different "Database last updated" dates, but that's not specific to
>the record -- that's the last time anything in the database was updated.

>I believe whois.internic.net is actually multiple machines.  It used to
>resolve to 4-5 addresses, depending on round-robin DNS for load balancing.
>Now it resolves to a single address, so I suspect they're using something
>like a LocalDirector to share the load.  So I suspect the differences
>you're seeing may be due to the servers getting out of sync.

Well, I'm sure you're right about the servers being out of sync. but
it's getting worse not better.  As of 9am Eastern this Jan 6, I'm
getting responses with Jan 4th,  5th, and  6th as the update time+date
stamp.  

I sent off a (client's) registration request to the Internic yesterday
afternoon, and it took 3 hrs to get an acknowledgement E-mail and no
confirmation as of 9am this morning. this is way slower than a few
months ago when I got both within minutes.  (IIRC, I actually got a
confirmation on the request before I got the E-mail acknowledgement !)

This should be interesting, because for the registration request filed
yesterday, I can still bring up both the Jan 4 record for the domain
being on hold, and the undated response that there's "no match"
indicating the domain being up for grabs.

To use an old restaurant expression, I'm beginning to think the
Internic is..... "In the Weeds".


----------  
"I hate quotations"- Ralph Waldo Emerson

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Mark Jeftov » Thu, 07 Jan 1999 04:00:00


[Posted and mailed]


Quote:> Well, I'm sure you're right about the servers being out of sync. but
> it's getting worse not better.  As of 9am Eastern this Jan 6, I'm
> getting responses with Jan 4th,  5th, and  6th as the update time+date
> stamp.  

I can second that. If you do a whois on a domain that transferred to us
a couple days ago, you sometimes get the old record, and others get the
new record. My guess is at least one of the servers isn't getting
updated but is still answering queries (with info at least a day old).

-mark

--
|||| mark jeftovic    (MJ177)   ====  http://www.shmooze.net/~markjr     ||||
|||| easyDNS Technologies Inc.  ====  http://www.easyDNS.com             ||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 dns hosting / domain registrations / web forwarding / mail forwarding / etc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Tom Turne » Sun, 10 Jan 1999 04:00:00


The internic whois is indeed acting strange.

I registered a domain on 1/07/99 and received
email confirmation from internic that the request
had been completed on 1/08/99

The whois record for the domain appeared in
the whois database after the whois database was
updated on 1/08/99 at 5:02am EST

But there was no billing contact listed!

And when a whois was done on the domain,
sometimes the record would appear and
sometimes it would say "No Match".

Not good.

Upon this mornings whois database update
at  9-Jan-99 04:29:47 EST, the billing contact
appeared on the record.

But currently, if you whois the domain, sometimes
the record appears and sometimes it says, "No Match"

Still not good...

This issue needs to be addressed. It would be very
easy to lose a domain that you previously registered.


> I can second that. If you do a whois on a domain that transferred to us
> a couple days ago, you sometimes get the old record, and others get the
> new record. My guess is at least one of the servers isn't getting
> updated but is still answering queries (with info at least a day old).

> -mark

> --
> |||| mark jeftovic    (MJ177)   ====  http://www.shmooze.net/~markjr     ||||
> |||| easyDNS Technologies Inc.  ====  http://www.easyDNS.com             ||||
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  dns hosting / domain registrations / web forwarding / mail forwarding / etc
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Richard J. Sext » Sun, 10 Jan 1999 04:00:00


The whois servers are not hold up well to attack by
clods mining the database.



Quote:

>The internic whois is indeed acting strange.

>I registered a domain on 1/07/99 and received
>email confirmation from internic that the request
>had been completed on 1/08/99

>The whois record for the domain appeared in
>the whois database after the whois database was
>updated on 1/08/99 at 5:02am EST

>But there was no billing contact listed!

>And when a whois was done on the domain,
>sometimes the record would appear and
>sometimes it would say "No Match".

--

70, 72 280SE; 83 300SD           http://www.mbz.org
 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Tim Shopp » Sun, 10 Jan 1999 04:00:00



> The whois servers are not hold up well to attack by
> clods mining the database.

I've seen dramatic reductions in "whois" successes in the
past year.  It used to be that you either connected and
got the information, or you didn't connect and got an error
message.  Now a good chunk (sometimes up to 80%)
of the responses come back empty, missing information, or
(rarely) just plain garbled.

Who are these clods mining the database?  What do they hope
to gain?  What are they doing, just alphabetically scanning
through domain-name space?

Tim.

 
 
 

Internic Whois Acting Strangely!!! Different Database Dates!!

Post by Arthur Emerson I » Mon, 11 Jan 1999 04:00:00



Quote:

> Who are these clods mining the database?

Spammers and crackers/hackers.

Quote:> What do they hope to gain?


upon.  Natural selection will get them sooner or later, since the tech
contacts of a site are sure to have the ability to black-hole them from
an entire site at the border router(s).

Hackers/crackers are looking for UNIX systems to hack.  Since UNIX is
still pre* as the DNS server of choice, where else in the world can
you find a database full of systems just waiting to be probed?  Since
mid-November, our InterNIC-registered primary and secondary DNS servers
have been probed daily for various known security bugs, while our main
mail/web/news servers haven't been touched.  Most of the time, the source
is a root-compromised UNIX system, itself being hacked in the plague of
attacks.  I posted a warning here about a month ago, and will reiterate it
again.  If your DNS servers are not blocking every well-known port with
tcp_wrappers, you are asking for trouble.  In addition, if your system is
running a web server (that you might not even know it is), there are real
bugs in various /cgi-bin programs that can give anyone with a web browser
root access on your system just by asking for a web page.  Clamp down now,
or be waiting for the e-mail to come pouring in from other sites letting
you know you've been compromised.

Quote:> What are they doing, just alphabetically scanning through domain-name space?

It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't a popular hacking tool that was
doing just that.  If you take a look back a few months, InterNIC had a
news story where they talked about the harvesting.  They even went as far
as blocking a few of the worst offenders.  I'd suggest that you read it
if you can find it.....
 
 
 

1. InterNIC WHOIS Database NOT Updating

The InterNIC WHOIS database has not updated since the 27th of July.  Does
anyone know why?  

Also, in the past, I have noticed that the database does not update at the
same time across the country.  I am in the MST time zone and when it
updates at 4am EDT, for example, I don't see it until about 4am MST, when I
should see it at 1amMST...Arizona doesn't go on DST if you are
wondering....

Anyone know what is going on?
--

Bear Down,
Amit Mehrotra

MARCH 31, 1997, WAS THE GREATEST DAY OF AMIT MEHROTRA'S LIFE, AND THE
GREATEST DAY IN THE HISTORY OF TUCSON, ARIZONA, USA.  ON THE EVENING OF
THAT DAY, OUR LIFE,  OUR LOVE, OUR TEAM, OUR UNIVERSITY SHINED ACROSS THE
NATION, AROUND THE WORLD, AND THROUGH THE UNIVERSE.  ON MARCH 31, 1997, THE
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA WON THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION'S
DIVISION I MEN'S BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP.  THE NAMES OF MILES SIMON,
MICHAEL DICKERSON, JASON TERRY, A.J. BRAMLETT, BENNETT DAVISON, DONNELL
HARRIS, MIKE BIBBY, EUGENE EDGERSON, JASON LEE, JOSH PASTNER, JOHN ASH,
JASON STEWART, AND JUSTIN WESSELL WILL BE FOREVER ENGRAINED IN SPORTS
HISTORY.

BEAR DOWN SEAN ELLIOT
BEAR DOWN J.F. MCKALE
BEAR DOWN JOHN BUTTON SALMON
BEAR DOWN ARIZONA

Amit Mehrotra has completed eleven grade levels at Canyon del Oro High
School.  He once said, "The UofA, with its illustrious Arizona Stadium,
magical McKale Center, and legendary Bear Down Gymnasium is heav

2. Multipage form

3. Internic gopher access to database vs. whois access

4. FS: CBM CD32's/SX1 exp mod.

5. Whois database access or VB programmatic access to Whois?

6. Hyperlinks

7. What mdoem do I have and why does it make mty sound card act strangely?

8. User Level NFS Server

9. WHOIS AT INTERNIC

10. whois.internic.net

11. - WHOIS rs.internic.net DEAD - permanently!

12. whois -h rs.internic.net for net addresses doesn't work?

13. whois (rs.internic.net) slow lately?