Very Computer

by **John Nav** » Tue, 17 Aug 1999 04:00:00

[POSTED TO comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains]

Quote:>If the government now reverses itself then it better explain to me why it
>refused my request. I'd suggest further that the government's reversal
>would be so egregious an act that it could possibly trigger the statutory
>penalties of the Privacy Act, an amount which could easily cumulate to
>several billions of dollars of damages against NTIA.

ROTFL.

--
Best regards,

by **Richard J. Sext** » Tue, 17 Aug 1999 04:00:00

>[POSTED TO comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains]

>>If the government now reverses itself then it better explain to me why it
>>refused my request. I'd suggest further that the government's reversal
>>would be so egregious an act that it could possibly trigger the statutory
>>penalties of the Privacy Act, an amount which could easily cumulate to
>>several billions of dollars of damages against NTIA.

>ROTFL.

I didn't write the above, Karl Augbach did; he's a lawyer at Cicso
who has been making a big deal out of this for years and understand
it better than almost anybody. You may laugh at it if you want
but in the absence of a conflicting legal opinion, it doesn't
really mean a whole lot.

--

http://killifish.vrx.net http://www.mbz.org http://lists.aquaria.net
Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada, 70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD +1 (613) 473-1719

Very Computer

whois database issue

whois database issue

whois database issue