Very Computer

>I have a question:
>When I test a managed element OID (agent) with Tcl,
>Which one should I use scotty or  UC Davis snmp application" ?
>I think both of them work.

> >I have a question:
> >When I test a managed element OID (agent) with Tcl,
> >Which one should I use scotty or  UC Davis snmp application" ?
> >I think both of them work.
> .
> .
> .
> They do.  I like 'em both.

> Scotty development is at a higher level.  Your question
> is (very) roughly equivalent to asking whether you should
> program in C or Tcl.  The answer, of course, is both,
> depending on your circumstances.

> In the absence of any other information, I recommend Scotty.
> --

> Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net
> Personal:  http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html

>> >Hi,

>> >I have a question:
>> >When I test a managed element OID (agent) with Tcl,
>> >Which one should I use scotty or  UC Davis snmp application" ?
>> >I think both of them work.
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> They do.  I like 'em both.

>> Scotty development is at a higher level.  Your question
>> is (very) roughly equivalent to asking whether you should
>> program in C or Tcl.  The answer, of course, is both,
>> depending on your circumstances.
> just want verify agent side implementation. such as set new
> OID variable; get correct OID variable and receive correct
> trip and do a regession snmp OID test.
> make sure agent side no problem before setup/build  NMS.
> What do you think use UC Davis (snmpwalk/set/get) with Tcl
> or Scotty?

>> In the absence of any other information, I recommend Scotty.