Anyone have any suggestions for creating a rule which will do the
following:
etc will be sent to another SMTP machine for processing? All other
addresses will be treated as they are now. I am running sendmail
8.8.5.
Thanks,
Anyone have any suggestions for creating a rule which will do the
following:
etc will be sent to another SMTP machine for processing? All other
addresses will be treated as they are now. I am running sendmail
8.8.5.
Thanks,
Regards,
Claus Assmann
--
[Please don't send me copies of usenet postings. Thanks!]
<URL: http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/%7Eca/ >
1. compose-rules like reply-rules
I have several reply-rules defined; they work fine. Now I want to have a
parallel set of compose-rules. basicall the same set of rules but with
_TO_ substituted for _FROM_/_ADDRESS_. But whatever I put in compose-rules
seems to be ignored. :-(
For example, I put in
I note that the help screen uses >> where I've put == in my rules. Doesn't
affectt the (non)function of the rule.
I've been through the on-line help, the offical web site, the unofficial
web sites, and search the google archive of this group. But without
finding any help on this problem.
Can I use compose-rules like this? If so, what should the rule look like
the "reply" string is inserted properly. If it does not work like this is
there a patch to make it work --- I couldn't see one on Eduardo Chappa's
site.
I'm using pine 4.44 with several of Eduardo's patches already installed,
especially those that adds functionality to reply-rules.
Regards, Trevor
<>< Re: deemed!
2. strcpy(struct.arrayofchars[], char*)
5. Setting a rule to forward a new mail to another email address
6. Adding to the control order
7. Sendmail From: address rewrite rules
9. Need wildcard rule to check username in address
10. Rule to put ""'s around an address...
11. Rewriting rule to extract information from email address
12. Problem with local IP addresses in check_rcpt rule set
13. Problems with "bang" addresses & rewrite rules