> ......and in reply I say!:
> If you ask me a question, and I attempt to answer it, then you simply
> reply stating what you have done next, and ask another question,
> without any reference to previous messages, then I will rapidly start
> to ignore you. This is not _just_ sheer shittiness. It is
> practicality, when I am trying to suss out a problem over the Net (or
> even face to face).
> Never had any luck helping a fart get out of a colander.
> >I have access to Cakewalk and Logic now. the Cakewalk tutorial is
> >asking to load some tutorial1.wrk file whatever it is i guess it is
> >not any where in the Cakewalk directory. I can't find any .wrk files
> >to proceed with tutorial. Can you good guys point me to where do I get
> >I haven't done any sound proccessing staff, but I am one of those
> >software guys......
> Nick White --- HEAD:Hertz Music
> (please remove ns from my header email address to reply)
> ....damn spam
> _/ )
> ( )
> _//- \__/
> The part of you that I hate is the part of you that
> hates the part of me that hates the part of you that
> hates me for hating the part of you that I hate.
I posted several questions on this news group as well as others and in
many cases they were answered by both very knowlagable people and real
experts in the field of sound engineering such as yourself. It is very
inappropriate from me not to aknowlage the value of your opinion,
please except my apology. If you choose to rapidly ignore my postings
I anderstand; it would be rassional from the application of knowlage
point of view to share your expertise with professionals rather then
with deletants like myself.