Very Computer

by **Avedi** » Tue, 28 Dec 1999 04:00:00

whats so wrong with sambar server that no one hardly uses it... i love it. i
mean its fast and has lots of feature and its free.. i mean i know stuff
like IIS and Orielly products are aweseom but their expensive... and why is
everyone getting into xitami.. i hate that.. its very hard to use and doesnt
seem to be very robust..
whats up with all this?
are more ppl using sambar these days?

--
http://ecchs.dhs.org/

by **Avedi** » Tue, 28 Dec 1999 04:00:00

whats so wrong with sambar server that no one hardly uses it... i love it. i
mean its fast and has lots of feature and its free.. i mean i know stuff
like IIS and Orielly products are aweseom but their expensive... and why is
everyone getting into xitami.. i hate that.. its very hard to use and doesnt
seem to be very robust..
whats up with all this?
are more ppl using sambar these days?

--
http://ecchs.dhs.org/

by **russ** » Fri, 31 Dec 1999 04:00:00

only about 500,000 ppl are using sambar we usally dont talk here cause this is
dominated by apache

> whats so wrong with sambar server that no one hardly uses it... i love it. i
> mean its fast and has lots of feature and its free.. i mean i know stuff
> like IIS and Orielly products are aweseom but their expensive... and why is
> everyone getting into xitami.. i hate that.. its very hard to use and doesnt
> seem to be very robust..
> whats up with all this?
> are more ppl using sambar these days?

> --
> http://ecchs.dhs.org/