I have the DVC 325 and had the same problem. I did
download the XP driver from Kodak as previously
recommended. After I installed it, my camera was still not
recognized by the PC. I then went in to Device Manager in
XP and verfied that the USB ports were enabled. I had a
yellow explaination point (!) next to the USB device. I
right clicked on it and repaired the Kodak driver. Then
everything work great and my camera appeared in the
Scanner and Camera's section of XP too. Hope this helps.
I am not my XP PC and I tried to recalled what I did from
memory.
Mark
Quote:>-----Original Message-----
>Windows Movie Maker, PaperPort 7.0 (in the Select
Source), and MS Picture
>It! Publishing 2001 all recognize my ViCam even though it
isn't in the
>Scanners and Cameras. I haven't had a need to use it for
any of these apps
>but I did verify that it was listed in there.
>> Yes, I have already installed the drivers, but they
were originally for
>> Win2K. I just thought that if I had my camera in that
folder other
>> applications that can be used with digital cameras
would not recognize I
>had
>> one.
>> > I have a ViCam USB camera. It's not listed in the
Scanners and Cameras
Quote:>> > either but after installing the Win2k software for
it, it works fine
>even
>> > though I'm using it in XP Pro. Have you installed
the software for the
>> > Kodak without going to the Add an Imaging Device? I
see Kodak has
>updated
>> > drivers for Win2000 and WinXP at this url --
>http://www.veryComputer.com/
323Drivers.shtml
>> > Good Luck.
>> > > I have a Kodak DVC323 digital camera (*). The
drivers are the
>same
>> as
>> > > for Windows 2000. The problem is that I dont know
how to do to make
>my
>> > > camera appear in the Scanners and Cameras folder in
the Control Panel.
>I
>> > > have tried the Add an Imaging device option but
when I select my
>camera
>> it
>> > > then asks me to select a port (LPT1, COM1, COM2)
and I need to slect
>an
>> > USB
>> > > port which is not listed in the given options. Is
this because the
>> drivers
>> > > are not digitally signed by Microsoft ?
>> > > Thanks a lot,
>> > > Matthias
>.
by