by Filippon » Fri, 26 Jan 2001 20:03:29
It rarely works fine, and mostly produces sound that - although clear -
is totally swamped by a loud and rythmic "rraarrraarraarraarraa.." that
goes on forever and may be in step with incoming packets.
I use win98, and already tried multiple reinstalls of both 6.4 and 7,
to no avail.
Any clues?
TIA
Filippo
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
by blah » Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:34:23
ROFL. Sorry, only joking, couldn't resist...............
> It rarely works fine, and mostly produces sound that - although clear -
> is totally swamped by a loud and rythmic "rraarrraarraarraarraa.." that
> goes on forever and may be in step with incoming packets.
> I use win98, and already tried multiple reinstalls of both 6.4 and 7,
> to no avail.
> Any clues?
> TIA
> Filippo
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
by Filippon » Sat, 27 Jan 2001 23:36:16
I haven't even solved the simpler problem and you already remind me of
their constant nagging and complaining about earth weather, their
endless, repetitive, and rambling questions, their boring, noisy and
convoluted trinary metadigital mindstreams, their terrible belching and
flatulence, not to mention all the disgusting parasites, candy wrappers
and carpet stains they leave behind every thime they visit . . .
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
by blah » Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:26:04
> I haven't even solved the simpler problem and you already remind me of
> their constant nagging and complaining about earth weather, their
> endless, repetitive, and rambling questions, their boring, noisy and
> convoluted trinary metadigital mindstreams, their terrible belching and
> flatulence, not to mention all the disgusting parasites, candy wrappers
> and carpet stains they leave behind every thime they visit . . .
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
by blah » Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:29:10
Find out if you get the same problem.
If you don't, I'm guessing that your WMP if up the duff! Calls for
re-install.
(or all the files you are trying to play are corrupt!)
> I haven't even solved the simpler problem and you already remind me of
> their constant nagging and complaining about earth weather, their
> endless, repetitive, and rambling questions, their boring, noisy and
> convoluted trinary metadigital mindstreams, their terrible belching and
> flatulence, not to mention all the disgusting parasites, candy wrappers
> and carpet stains they leave behind every thime they visit . . .
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
by Filippon » Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:05:05
I reinstalled WMP at least three times, both in version 7 and 6.4
(which I prefer because it lets you store favorites).
That's why I find this problem so annoying!
F
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
by blah » Fri, 02 Feb 2001 00:09:46
You might find something helpful here :
http://www.nwlink.com/~zachd/pss/pss.html#offline
I'n not sure what the problem is but it sounds like it might be getting
down to driver/codec level.
> I reinstalled WMP at least three times, both in version 7 and 6.4
> (which I prefer because it lets you store favorites).
> That's why I find this problem so annoying!
> F
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
Just curious, has anyone been able to get the highest quality bitrate
on a multiple bitrate stream to work with WMP 6.4? For some reason,
whenever a WMP 6.4 client or a client that uses WMP 9's Netscape
plugin (which apparently uses the WMP 6.4 control even though it is
WMP 9), the lowest quality stream is always selected. How do I fix
this? Works fine in IE.
2. address book
3. WMP 6.4 & .MIDI = "The format is not supported."
4. A:\ drive no longer works properly
5. 3 short questions about embedding WMP using 6.4 & 7.x version controls.
6. SHDOC401.DLL
9. WMP 6.4 locks with IE 5.5 & Win95 -- why?
12. WMP 9 not working with WMP 6.4 clsID
13. WMP 7 install over WMP 6.4?