1-2-3 for OS/2 2.0

1-2-3 for OS/2 2.0

Post by 32-Bit_Apps_Belie.. » Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:33:48

 TIM>      Well, as I understand it (and I heard it from Lotus), Ami
 TIM> and 123 are both going to be completely native 32-bit apps.
This is
 TIM> because they use Borland C/C++ to do the development.  I don't
 TIM> about the rest of their products, though.

Interesting.  I wonder why 1-2-3 has references to IBM C Set/2
libraries inside its executables?  Perhaps it could be because it was
NOT done with Borland C/C++ for OS/2 but instead IBM C Set/2?

--- Maximus/2 2.01wb


1. Lotus 1-2-3 for OS/2 2.0 annonuced?


I just read in a Finnish computer magazine that Lotus is
*shipping* 1-2-3 for OS/2 2.0, true 32 bit application.
Is this true? Anyone seen it?

I know about 1-2-3/G and I don't mean it.

This (if true), could start a flood of 32-bit applications,
which would greatly help OS/2 gain some ground in corporate
world, where 1-2-3 is still a standard. Maybe it would put
Lotus back to top as a software supplier, since Microsoft
apparently has no plans to ship Excel for OS/2 2.0.

Comments, anyone?

-------------------- A Happy User of OS/2 2.1 beta! ---------------------

Jari Lehtonen, Student of Computer Science, University of Turku, Finland.
" Blind faith in your leaders, or in anything, will get you killed."
                                        -Bruce Springsteen

2. Which CD-R?

3. Lotus 1-2-3 for OS/2 2.0 upgrade prices?

4. Setting the Time on a Samba server

5. Can Lotus 1-2-3 Release 2.0 for OS/2 be made to work with Warp?

6. ---Welcome to comp.lang.c++! Read this first.

7. 1-2-3 Release 2.0 for OS/2 losing icons!!!!

8. Secondary Site Installation pending

9. Lotus 1-2-3 2.0 for OS/2

10. Lotus 1-2-3 v 2.0 for OS/2 problems

11. Lotus 1-2-3 G Conversion to Lotus 1-2-3 for Windows

12. Lotus 1-2-3 OLE problem (OS/2)

13. Lotus 1-2-3 ver. 2.1 for OS/2 min/max problem