I was at a DEC/MS conference on Windows NT last fall, and DEC went out of theirQuote:>Microsoft does not want to publicise the image of NT being a baby of
>VMS, does it? Why? Was it ever advertised as a 'better Unix than Unix'.
>Or in truth is it a 'better VMS than VMS'?
way to say NT was the successor to VMS.
The one class on porting Unix to NT was worth going just to watch the hair
on the back of the Unix guys necks stand up <G>.
"The information contained in this article represents my current view on
the issues discussed at the date of posting. Because I must respond
to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a
commitment on my part, and I cannot guarantee the accuracy of any
information presented after the date of posting"