>: >He might also have stock in a banana plantation, doesn't mean he sells
>: >bananas. :)
>: Why not? All the chimps that buy into his marketing scheme have to get
>: their food from somewhere! :)
>Hmmm, is that really necessary? You get upset when people riddicule your
>choice in computers, I would figure you would not want to do the same?
I don't fully like the PC architecture but with the above comments, it was
mainly aimed at his software empire marketing scheme and sales. But with
Bill Gates and the way things are going now.. I don't think a lot of the
consumers really worry what is behind the architecture as long as it runs
Windows and its spinoff applications. This is what needs to be stopped.
If I see one more "Oops there goes another * tree" Microsoft ad, I
think I will go crazy! :) They must be counting how many people (*
trees) they are converting to the "Wintel" monopoly.
How about that Intel Pentium processor commercial where some guy is
playing monopoly through the net with another guy in some other state and
that his game of monopoly would be "that much better if he were using.."
They must be grasping at straws for commercial ideas now! :)
I don't mind this common dislike for Intel and Microsoft (thus Bill Gates)
as it is so widespread. Slap a decent OS on those systems like OS/2 or
Linux etc. and Intel doesn't look as evil but when compared to Motorolla
etc. they do. :) I won't get into specific namebrands, I could, based on
quality (as you have seen before) but to me, one PC clone is as bad as the
next. I have a bit more respect for the Macintosh, but not it's OS. This
is a different arguement then whether one uses an Amiga 1000, 500, 1200 or
2/3/4000 or whteher or not they still make use out of their C64. To me
they are all Amigas or a "predecessor" to them, most serve a common ground
with the others offering slightly better performance... but all of them belong
to the same "family". To me this "family" has a better architecture of
hardware and OS design then the rest of the computer industry. It is not the
Amiga's fault that R&D has stopped on it for over 4 years. Besides which,
I wasn't getting specific in naming people (computer users) in the
situation.. big difference. :)
>: But seriously.. the bloat in the software sells processors, memory and
>: hard drives which Bill Gates gets money from also (besides the software).
>Sure, but is that a bad thing? The result of that is more hardware for your
>money. Bill's evil is on the software side.
That is not a bad thing for the consumer but for business it is.
>: When his OS/software is bundled with newly sold machines.. whether the
>: consumer uses it or not, he gets the money for it. He sells buggy
>A lot of PCs are also sold without an os.
I agree.. all those that came with DOS and Windows. :)
>: software and makes people think that a computer program = bugs = will be
>: fixed next version, which we will also charge you for... thus more money
>: in that way also.
>The evil I see is screwing with his own os in order to sell more of his own
>applications and hinder the competition.
True but Bill Gates is the only person who can sell beta software to
people in which they actually have to PAY to help Microsoft work the bugs
out of their programs.. which they never do entirely... leading to an
endless loop! :)