On 6 May 98 19:35:59 GMT
> <whining stripped>
Sure, you whining, but you miserably failed to answer the valid
questions that were in
Let's take a look.
>> > One day you'll have the curtisy not to deliberatly fill the
>> > news-group with duplicate issues.
>> Heh curtisy[sic]?Deliberately[sic]?
Nice answer bozo, showing your age
>> Now you are concerned about bandwidth?
> Not really, think you can manage to spot another
> much better reason?
Then explain the "fill the news-group[sic]", in less than 10 line, and
stick to the topic, and no flames.
Think you can do that?
I might asked too much from you.
>> You?The flamer/Lamer, who is filling this newsgroup
>> with tons and tons of flames and junk?
> I don't doubt it,
Then shut up.
Quote:>but I don't spam the group with a
> dozen new irrelevant threads about issues you
> should know will probably never come to an end.
Shall we do a little search in Dejanews for a start?
You'll be amazed. ;-)
Speaking of relevancy, can you entertain us with how relevant to this
newsgroup is your pathetic misspelled threads like"New csaa thread,
old farts play the fat game",...etc?
BTW, how can a "fart" play a "fart game"?
Can you spell double standards?
Hey a least I put the right subject there, a valid question relevant
and backed up by full message IDs and URLs, unlike, you quote what you
like others to see, not what happened, and when faced with the facts
and the REAL quotes you moaned about the size of the post.
Quote:> Why do you insist on doing that?
Sorry if it kicked your ass, I din't know that posting valid questions
and quoting your black history will annoy you this much. ;-)
>> You are now talking about respect here?
>> Since when?
>> Didn't you earlier call this newsgroup, a "dump"?
>> If you need your memory refreshed, ask nicely, I will
>> post your own words.
> Of course, it seems you're incapable of having respect
> and accept for people even if you _couldn't_ care less
> about them.
Funny, someone flamed the whole newsgroup calling it a "dump:, now
asks for respect.
Can you spell confusion?
I don't think that you even see.
Quote:> Why do you think it's impossible to respect a person,
> for what he/she is, even though you disagree _strongly_
> on the issues, and maybe even personality?
I'm afraid that is YOU, you attacked me foolishly just because we
disagreed upon Lasse(assuming that he is a different person which he's
not), and started all this BS.
Quote:> Reminds me of a classic case of emotional foolishness,
> where objective resaon is replaced by subjective
Try the above again in English.
Quote:> You're too fired up
Are you sure?
Actually it's you, you're too much filled with hatred, that you cannot
even see some basic facts.
Quote:>to even notice your single-handed escalation
So I did jump into discussions and starting flaming you, eh?
Or I did post your pathetic, and cluess"New csaa thread...."
Or I did post those long and boring rambling and rants of flames,
7/11, welfare forms, ...etc, right?
Oops, sorry to make a fool of you again.
Quote:> of a few featherbrained issues, speaking
Nice to see that you admit that.
Quote:> of both of us, into something that looks mistakenly
> like a personal vendetta where no rules or m*
So by you flaming me in person, I am wrong in taking it as a personal
Nice logic you've got there.
BTW, you might wanna inform yourself that if you check a site like
http://www.veryComputer.com/ vendetta means:
1 : * FEUD
2 : an often prolonged series of retaliatory, vengeful, or hostile
acts or exchange of such acts <waged a personal vendetta against those
who opposed his nomination>
As you can see that you perfectly fit into this description, as you
entire pathetic quest in comp.sys.amiga.advocacy is trying to
retaliate, and seek vengeance for me calling you a lamer, which you
As usual you are too busy flaming and too much filled with hatred to
see this small fact.
Quote:> distinctions applies - and deliberately spaming them
> over the entire newsgroup.
Spamming means off topic, that means you posts fall in that category
Not my fault to spank you this hard. ;-)
Quote:> Or, would you care to prove that I'm wrong?
I don't need to, your posts are doing that already, your own words.
Or see the above for a clue.
>> > Regards...
>> You mean flames of course.
> According to your philosophy, I might agree with
> that. After all, you're the one that interpret any use
> of harsh language, no matter how ironic it's meant
> to be, as pure flames and insults.
So all that name calling and flaming from you was ironic?
Nice new excuse you've found there.
Quote:> One of these days you'll probably learn that there
> is a difference.
One of these days, you'll probably learn not to bring silly excuses
everytime you are cornered.
So couldn't answer all that right?
How about answering the lie about your flames being "irony" there?
Quote:> *grin* This "6 times and counting" Lasse buggy of yours
> looks more and more ridicules every time you mention it.
You looks more annoying to you, as it is making you mad and sleepless
at night browsing the Net for flames to compose.
Sorry for making an ass of you.
Quote:> If you didn't understand a word of what you yourself used
> hours replying to in other threads then be my guest - one
> could almost start accusing you for some restless whining.
Incompetent flaming, and snipping at convenience more like, on your
part, as usual.
Quote:> Trying to score a humour-point again, are we? <g>
No need to score, you have a self destroying mechanism, and it is
working at full speed. ;-)
Reinserting the snipped questions that you failed to answer, for the
7th(amazing how you are a slow thinker) and counting.
[The Bolsoy kid is not happy with the war earlier between me and his
Why are you whining about that?
Did he assign you as a spokesman for him?
Are you his wife, husband, sister, brother, cousin, or a relative of
If not then shut up and stop whining, stop your ass kissing.
Let him fight his own battles, in short grow up.
Let's see if you can read this time, and try to stick to the subject,
no flames and in less than 100 lines or rambling, are you up to the
Happy snipping. ;-)