by Larry Listo » Fri, 10 Mar 2000 04:00:00
Thanks,
Larry Liston
by Anders Rimme » Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:00:00
4 hours' eh? a pentium II on win9x takes 40+ hours... so I'd say it's OK
performance...
regards,
Anders
Quote:> Anyone running seti on those Alpha machines. I have a UP2000 with 1-21264
> 750mhz and 8 meg cache. It has 768 megs or RAM. I'm running Rdhat 6.1
kernel
> 2.2.14. It takes seti about 4 hours to process a workunit. Maybe I'm an
> optimist, but I expected a little better from a $10000 machine with very
> little else running. Anyone have better results?
> Thanks,
> Larry Liston
by Tod » Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:00:00
The optimized seti code does a unit in ~ 1hr on a 667Mhz 21264.
So if you could get your hands on that you should be churning out units in
~50 mins.
I think I heard that better seti code (fft) may arive with the V3 bins.
not sure if that is the fully optimized code.
Quote:> Anyone running seti on those Alpha machines. I have a UP2000 with 1-21264
> 750mhz and 8 meg cache. It has 768 megs or RAM. I'm running Rdhat 6.1
kernel
> 2.2.14. It takes seti about 4 hours to process a workunit. Maybe I'm an
> optimist, but I expected a little better from a $10000 machine with very
> little else running. Anyone have better results?
> Thanks,
> Larry Liston
Hi,
Any comments on the setup of the Matrox Mystique, with Xfree86 would be
appreciated.
Cheers,
David Pearson
2. Ftp'ing .gz file from Server
3. Seagate Cheeta 36Giga LW hard disk and UP2000
4. Why are there not more 64bit or at least largefile aware applications?
5. The on-board aic-7890 in the UP2000 system
6. rcp
7. Where's the SRM manual? (for UP2000)
8. Printing: Lpr can't connect to Lpd
9. clicking in recorded sound on a UP2000
10. Upper limit of memory capacity of UP2000
11. UP2000 Memory
12. STREAMS & UP2000
13. UP2000 clock getting set to the year 2048