Building KDE

Building KDE

Post by wej37 » Fri, 04 May 2001 01:50:59



I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
to build kernel/qrichtext.o in the qt2 port.  Is this normal or
do I need to change anything?

Eric Johnson

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by Dave Uhrin » Fri, 04 May 2001 06:30:40



> I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
> to build kernel/qrichtext.o in the qt2 port.  Is this normal or
> do I need to change anything?

> Eric Johnson

Some of those c++ sources do seem to take forever.  Use a different xterm
or console and run top to see what's happening.

Or upgrade to a 1.0GHz Athlon with 256MB minimum :-)

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by David B Terre » Fri, 04 May 2001 06:54:08




>> I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
>> to build kernel/qrichtext.o in the qt2 port.  Is this normal or
>> do I need to change anything?

>> Eric Johnson

>Some of those c++ sources do seem to take forever.  Use a different xterm
>or console and run top to see what's happening.

>Or upgrade to a 1.0GHz Athlon with 256MB minimum :-)

Or just install the precompiled binaries.

--
David Terrell            | "Instead of plodding through the equivalent of
Prime Minister, NebCorp  | literary Xanax, the pregeeks go for sci-fi and

http://wwn.nebcorp.com   | http://www.monkeybagel.com/ "Origins of Sysadmins"

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by wej37 » Fri, 04 May 2001 07:15:24




: >
: >> I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
: >> to build kernel/qrichtext.o in the qt2 port.  Is this normal or
: >> do I need to change anything?
: >>
: >> Eric Johnson
: >>
: >
: >Some of those c++ sources do seem to take forever.  Use a different xterm
: >or console and run top to see what's happening.
: >
: >Or upgrade to a 1.0GHz Athlon with 256MB minimum :-)
:
: Or just install the precompiled binaries.

That kind of takes the fun out of it.  But I'll try it and see
what happens.

Eric Johnson

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by colonel pan » Fri, 04 May 2001 18:45:42



Quote:>I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever

last time i tried this -- about two weeks ago -- it took two and a half days
before it exited on an error. hugely underpowered machine, i might add.

cp

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by wej37 » Sat, 05 May 2001 05:09:19



: >I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
:
: last time i tried this -- about two weeks ago -- it took two and a half days
: before it exited on an error. hugely underpowered machine, i might add.

Two and a half days!

Hmmm.  I might as well kill the job now.

I did take advantage of the delay this afternoon to go
get a haircut.  So it wasn't a complete waste of time.

By the way, I tried using the packages, but it seems to me
that it was mixing up multiple versions and wouldn't run at all.

Eric Johnson

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by wej37 » Sat, 05 May 2001 21:47:35



: >I'm building the KDE port on OpenBSD 2.8 and it is taking forever
:
: last time i tried this -- about two weeks ago -- it took two and a half days
: before it exited on an error. hugely underpowered machine, i might add.

That must have been a bit underpowered.  I went ahead and let it
finish and it took less than 24 hours on mine.  I'm not sure how
much left because it was still running when I went to sleep after
midnight and it was finished when I woke up.

I haven't tried it out yet.  I hope it works.

Eric Johnson

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by taopun » Wed, 09 May 2001 11:49:33


I wonder if it is possible to compile OpenBSD binaries on another platform,
such as Linux...?  Anyone?
Quote:> Or just install the precompiled binaries.

 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by Jan-Uwe Finc » Wed, 09 May 2001 16:44:17




Quote:>I wonder if it is possible to compile OpenBSD binaries on another platform,
>such as Linux...?  Anyone?

That makes no sense.
Binaries _are _ already compiled.
 
 
 

Building KDE

Post by Marc Esp » Thu, 10 May 2001 01:55:11


Yes, it should be possible. But it's not very easy. And no, we don't have
plans to make it easier right now. Not that it might not be a good idea,
just that it needs manpower to fix details that we currently don't have.
 
 
 

1. Building KDE 2.0 with KDE 1.1.x active...

I've tracked down the problem taht I've been having trying to build off
the KDE 2.0 line (using cvsup to download) to one sequence, which
probably isn't that uncommon:

1) I'm currently running KDE 1.1.2, which is what is installed in my
/usr/lib and /usr/include directories.
2) I'm trying to build KDE 2.0 in this environment.
3) The configure scripts put /usr/include as the $kde_include directive.

4) The configure scripts put $kde_include as the first thing for the
makefiles to include.
5) This causes, when building, things like:
#include <qt*.h>
#include <k*.h>
to load the 1.1.x versions in /usr/include, not hte ones that I've built
out of qt-copy and kdelibs.
This doesn't compile.

If I hack up the makefiles in question to load /usr/include AFTER the
local versions then I'm all ready and set to go. However, I'm sure there
is a way to do this within the configure scripts (but I haven't found
out how to do it).

As a small point, my first configures were done without QTDIR and
KDEDIR set. I've set those environment variables now and I'm trying
again.

If someone knows how to accomplish this, I'd greatly appreciate a reply!

Thanks in advance,

Kirk Wylie

2. multiple-device driver (MD): performance?

3. Building KDE 1.1.2?

4. NFS write protect question

5. Building kde 3.1 with konstruct

6. Info: Working third party PCI Cards under AIX

7. problem building kde-1.1.1 from src

8. FreeBSD 1.0 , anyone..?

9. Trouble building KDE 1.1.2 as well :-(

10. libbfd.so problem while building kde

11. Building KDE

12. Building KDE for alpha

13. Building KDE 1.1 on Solaris x86 - please help