anywhere that you cannot use any other system than Windows 95/98. Further
more, as much as I was surprised, it's clearly stated that if "you decide to
responsible for any damage you might suffer due to running those services on
There was a long thread about it (among other things, I posted the exact
wording of this agreement). What you are saying used to be the case in the
past. It must have changed (maybe at least here in New Jersey).
brought up the question of me running ftp and http servers. I said, yes and
agreement I cannot run it" to which I replied with a quote from their own
user agreement. Upon reading that, ftp and http server were no more brought
up into a conversation. If you have a chance to pick up such agreement from
It's very educational.
Again, it states nowhere that you can't use Linux or other OS different than
Windows 95/98. It only says that they will not support anything else which
is different from "forbidding" it. So, I don't think they have a legal
right to tell you that you can't use it. It's like GM telling you that you
can't use gas other than from Exxon.
Also, for those concerned with the security and port scans. There is a very
good piece of software called "portsentry" which is a "black hole" trap.
The way it works is you "hot wire" all the ports which normally wouldn't be
used by regular users. (the ports left opened would be 80, 21, 110, 25, 23,
53 and few others). If you are really paranoid, then you can increase your
security even more. If a potential attacker would try to exploit different
ports, "portsentry" would automatically block them off. The way it looks to
the attacker is an incredible slow down in the connection with a termination
couldn't because once they trip a "hot wired" port, they will not be able to
ping you and so on. You machine will become invisible.
I don't know what more security measure one can ask for...
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: Redhat, Linux, Media One, Security and Can They Do This?
> Message from the Deja.com forum:
> Your subscription is set to individual email delivery
> Get a FREE Electronic Organizer and try Netmarket for $1.
> Receive 3 months of money saving Netmarket privileges!
> Netmarket.com, the Web's premier shopping site.
> >My father-in-law has run into a snaffu with RedHat. It seems that he
> >had a linux machine set up with RedHat 5.1. Internally he has a couple
> >of Win95 machines that are connected to this machine. The machines
> >purpose is for data backup/storage and connection to the internet via
> >Media One's Internet Cable. He got a call last Wednesday from Media
> >One saying that they had 8 seperate counts of someone Port Scanning
> >from his Linux machine and that his account was terminated. Well it
> >turns out that someone had hacked their way into his computer and was
> >causing havoc... he caught him a couple of times and decided to upgrade
> >to RedHat 6.1 and learn more about linux security and how to prevent
> >(as much as possible) this from happening again.
> >My father in law (who we'll call Steve) had to plea with Media One's (a
> >big internet cable company here in New England) legal department. The
> >next day someone from Media One called and agreed to turn back on
> >service as long as he promised to not run Linux anymore.
> >My questions (I'm hoping you can help me... especially because this may
> >happen to me and alot of others in the future) are as follows:
> >1.) Can they (Media One) legally do this... that is deny service
> >because of the Operating System you choose?
> Does he have a contract or service agreement, and if so, what does it
> say? When I was looking into high bandwidth options here, and one thing
> that turned me off to cable was that they supposedly expressly forbid
> but suspect possibly this is the case with your bunch as well. At the
> time (6 months or so ago), there were rumors of them doing ramdom scans
> looking for this situation. The fact that their legal dept is involved
> would seem to indicate that they at least think they have grounds to do
> this. Is this kind of thing covered by the Public Service Commission?
> I am using ADSL here. The provider does not officially support linux,
> but have no problems with it and there is nothing in their agreement on
> this subject. How would they handle this situation? Dunno.
> Hal B
> Linux helps those who help themselves
> Deja.com: Before you buy.
> * To modify or remove your subscription, go to
> * Read this thread at