Very Computer

> You're probably having trouble compiling KDE applications because you
> don't have the KDE headers installed. It's hard to say because you don't
> say anything about what kind of system you're using. Please tell us more
> about what you're using.

> Furthermore, using KDE 1.X applications can be a * if you only have
> KDE 2.X installed. I have this problem myself when I try to compile
> packages that need KDE 1.X and don't setlle for 2.X. This problem can be
> fixed when it comes to the conflict between Qt 1.X and Qt 2.X, but I don't
> know about the KDE headers. When I come across a KDE app that simply
> requires KDE 1.X, I usually just nevermind it wait for another version
> which I hope is 2.X-compatible.

> In general, when you need help with this kind of things, you get much
> quicker and better results when you tell people as much as you can about
> what you are trying to use. Which application are you trying to install?
> Which version(s) of KDE do you have installed? I find it likely you're
> using Linux, and in which case, which distribution are you using? Which
> version of that distribution?

> Peace.

> Helgi Hrafn Gunnarsson

> > I have been trying to install some small programs and I get this error.

> > configure: error: your system is not able to compile a small KDE
> > application!

> > Check, if you installed the KDE header files correctly.

> > How do I fix this?

> > I have been trying to install some small programs and I get this
> > error.

> > configure: error: your system is not able to compile a small KDE
> > application!
> > Check, if you installed the KDE header files correctly.

> This error useally comes from KDE1 programs who need a Qt-1.4* version.
> If you do have Qt 1.4* installed then try compile using this option:

> ./configure --with-qt-dir=/path/to/qt-1.4*

> > The problem is not because the application is small. If it's able to
> > compile a *big* KDE application, it can compile a *small* one. This
> > phrase tends to confuse some people.

> > You're probably having trouble compiling KDE applications because you
> > don't have the KDE headers installed. It's hard to say because you don't
> > say anything about what kind of system you're using. Please tell us more
> > about what you're using.

> > Furthermore, using KDE 1.X applications can be a * if you only have
> > KDE 2.X installed. I have this problem myself when I try to compile
> > packages that need KDE 1.X and don't setlle for 2.X. This problem can be
> > fixed when it comes to the conflict between Qt 1.X and Qt 2.X, but I
> > don't know about the KDE headers. When I come across a KDE app that
> > simply requires KDE 1.X, I usually just nevermind it wait for another
> > version which I hope is 2.X-compatible.

> > In general, when you need help with this kind of things, you get much
> > quicker and better results when you tell people as much as you can about
> > what you are trying to use. Which application are you trying to install?
> > Which version(s) of KDE do you have installed? I find it likely you're
> > using Linux, and in which case, which distribution are you using? Which
> > version of that distribution?

> > Peace.

> > Helgi Hrafn Gunnarsson

> > > I have been trying to install some small programs and I get this
> > > error.

> > > configure: error: your system is not able to compile a small KDE
> > > application!

> > > Check, if you installed the KDE header files correctly.

> > > How do I fix this?

> Well I am running Slackware 7.0, kernel 2.2.14, KDE 2.0pre.  I am trying
> to install Kmamerun.

> > Well, Thank you, Thank you! I kept getting this error and thought I was
> > going insane. Glad to know it wasn't me. The error message is confusing
> > because it says you are apparently missing a kde part or something to
that
> > effect. I would be interested to learn if Daniel HAS the Qt-1.4 version
> > installed as well as the more recent ones. It was pointed out to me in
> this
> > newsgroup that Qt is NOT backwards compatible.

> > -mark

> Yes I haveQt-1.4 installed and Qt-2.2 installed.  I have pointed configure
> to Qt-1.4.  So did you get your stuff to install Mark?

>> > Well, Thank you, Thank you! I kept getting this error and thought I was
>> > going insane. Glad to know it wasn't me. The error message is confusing
>> > because it says you are apparently missing a kde part or something to
> that
>> > effect. I would be interested to learn if Daniel HAS the Qt-1.4 version
>> > installed as well as the more recent ones. It was pointed out to me in
>> this
>> > newsgroup that Qt is NOT backwards compatible.

>> > -mark

>> Yes I haveQt-1.4 installed and Qt-2.2 installed.  I have pointed
>> configure
>> to Qt-1.4.  So did you get your stuff to install Mark?