OK, I made a stupid mistake, when downloading different distros of Linux to try out on Mac I also downloaded a lot of extra stuff.
Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
TIA
Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
TIA
Linux to try out on Mac I also downloaded a lot of extra stuff.Quote:> OK, I made a stupid mistake, when downloading different distros of
You will have to do this in macos since linuxppc cannot read/mount HFS+Quote:> Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
> TIA
> > Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
> > TIA
> You will have to do this in macos since linuxppc cannot read/mount HFS+
> partitions. You could boot into macos and copy the files from the HFS+
> disk to the /boot partition. Then reboot into linux then move the files
> from /boot to their final desitnation.
> --
> Bob
TIA
> > Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
In my experience, LinuxDisks is 10x friendlier GUI-wise, and 10x
slower speed-wise (than hfsplusutils). hfsplusutils is command
line only, and uses a slightly odd "virtual mount" convention and
command syntax, so you want to read the docs before using.
In either case, you probably want to have the latest/greatest Disk
First Aid for your MacOS version handy to run afterward, and to
approach with a "get in, copy stuff, get out ASAP" mindset.
HTH,
D.
Quote:> You will have to do this in macos since linuxppc cannot read/mount HFS+
> partitions. You could boot into macos and copy the files from the HFS+
> disk to the /boot partition. Then reboot into linux then move the files
> from /boot to their final desitnation.
> > > OK, I made a stupid mistake, when downloading different distros of
> > > Linux to try out on Mac I also downloaded a lot of extra stuff.
> > > Any way to get it into my Linux partitions to install now?
> Either LinuxDisks from the MacOS side, as mentioned below (MountX is
> also a possibility, but I haven't heard of any positive experiences
> with it) . . . or hfsplusutils from the Linux side (contrary to the
> can't mount/read statement below - no slam, it's a common belief).
> In my experience, LinuxDisks is 10x friendlier GUI-wise, and 10x
> slower speed-wise (than hfsplusutils). hfsplusutils is command
> line only, and uses a slightly odd "virtual mount" convention and
> command syntax, so you want to read the docs before using.
I have all the latest greatest MacOS rescue stuff, but I'd rather not have to use it.Quote:> In either case, you probably want to have the latest/greatest Disk
> First Aid for your MacOS version handy to run afterward, and to
> approach with a "get in, copy stuff, get out ASAP" mindset.
OK, a bit more explaining should help. I am assuming that your linuxppcQuote:> But I can't see the Linux partitions from the MacOS side...
> How do I copy anything to there??
it can get messy if you do a lot of writing and deleting on the HFS+ side orQuote:>> In either case, you probably want to have the latest/greatest Disk
>> First Aid for your MacOS version handy to run afterward, and to
>> approach with a "get in, copy stuff, get out ASAP" mindset.
> I have all the latest greatest MacOS rescue stuff, but I'd rather not have
>to use it. Can I really scramble my MacOS Volume directory using these
>utilities?
<snippage>
Disclaimer: this is all "in my personal experience", on a Umax S900 (8500/9500 clone),Quote:> > In either case, you probably want to have the latest/greatest Disk
> > First Aid for your MacOS version handy to run afterward, and to
> > approach with a "get in, copy stuff, get out ASAP" mindset.
> > I have all the latest greatest MacOS rescue stuff, but I'd rather not have to use it.
> > Can I really scramble my MacOS Volume directory using these utilities?
My 3 main findings are:
1. hfsutils or mount -t commands: copies from HFS to ext2, no problems on
either side.
"Pushing" new files, or overwriting existing files, or deleting files on the
Mac side from
Linux side = no visible problems, but unfixable "cosmetic" errors in Disk
Utils 8.x and
early 9.x, and pre-Norton 5 utils (invalid node count, I think - and BTW I got
the same
deal going between BeOS <-> MacOS partitions.) Prime Directive: always
"pull" from the
foreign partition to the "native" one, using a native (obviously!) app. If
you absolutely
have to "push", push from the Mac (HFS) side to whatever (Linux, Be, etc).
2. Based on the Prime Directive above, for HFS+, use LinuxDisks to "pull"
ext2 -> HFS+,
or hfsplusutils to "pull" HFS+ -> ext2 . . . and if you can't help it for some
reason, only
ever "push" HFS+ -> ext2. Off the top of my head, I can't even remember if
HFS+ lets
you write ext2 -> HFS+ . . . since the mad notion of doing something along
those lines
would never cross my mind at this point. Staying inside this limitation, I've
never had
any problems with hfsplusutils.
For 1 and 2: treat the file exchange like an FTP session: fire up app, get
in, do your
thing, and get out/quit app.
. . . and afterwards, "just to be sure", you probably want to take a few secs
to run
Disk First Aid. With any luck, it'll be a purely superstitious waster of time.
3. If you're a whiz with MOL and you're comfortable with network-based
file-sharing, you
can use FTP, HTTP, NFS, ethernet-based appletalk, etc. as you see fit, I
believe. I
haven't personally been there and done that, so I couldn't say.
Good luck!
D.
> <snippage>
> > > In either case, you probably want to have the latest/greatest Disk
> > > First Aid for your MacOS version handy to run afterward, and to
> > > approach with a "get in, copy stuff, get out ASAP" mindset.
> > > I have all the latest greatest MacOS rescue stuff, but I'd rather not
> > > have to use it.
> > > Can I really scramble my MacOS Volume directory using these utilities?
> Disclaimer: this is all "in my personal experience", on a Umax S900
> (8500/9500 clone),
> across (Fast) SCSI drives via what I believe is a souped-up PCI bridge,
> between YDL
> 1.2 on 1 drive and MacOS 9.1 on another.
> My 3 main findings are:
> 1. hfsutils or mount -t commands: copies from HFS to ext2, no problems on
> either side.
> "Pushing" new files, or overwriting existing files, or deleting files on
> the
> Mac side from
> Linux side = no visible problems, but unfixable "cosmetic" errors in Disk
> Utils 8.x and
> early 9.x, and pre-Norton 5 utils (invalid node count, I think - and BTW I
> got
> the same
> deal going between BeOS <-> MacOS partitions.) Prime Directive: always
> "pull" from the
> foreign partition to the "native" one, using a native (obviously!) app. If
> you absolutely
> have to "push", push from the Mac (HFS) side to whatever (Linux, Be, etc).
> 2. Based on the Prime Directive above, for HFS+, use LinuxDisks to "pull"
> ext2 -> HFS+,
> or hfsplusutils to "pull" HFS+ -> ext2 . . . and if you can't help it for
> some
> reason, only
> ever "push" HFS+ -> ext2. Off the top of my head, I can't even remember
> if
> HFS+ lets
> you write ext2 -> HFS+ . . . since the mad notion of doing something along
> those lines
> would never cross my mind at this point. Staying inside this limitation,
> I've
> never had
> any problems with hfsplusutils.
> For 1 and 2: treat the file exchange like an FTP session: fire up app, get
> in, do your
> thing, and get out/quit app.
> . . . and afterwards, "just to be sure", you probably want to take a few
> secs
> to run
> Disk First Aid. With any luck, it'll be a purely superstitious waster of
> time.
> 3. If you're a whiz with MOL and you're comfortable with network-based
> file-sharing, you
> can use FTP, HTTP, NFS, ethernet-based appletalk, etc. as you see fit, I
> believe. I
> haven't personally been there and done that, so I couldn't say.
> Good luck!
> D.
> > I have all the latest greatest MacOS rescue stuff, but I'd rather not
> > have
> >to use it. Can I really scramble my MacOS Volume directory using these
> >utilities?
> it can get messy if you do a lot of writing and deleting on the HFS+ side
> or
> delete any of the normally hidden MacOS system files. webgod has good
> advice
> and worth following. copy the files over and then delete from MacOS.
Michael
> That's of course possible with MOL. Might requite ethertap (a fake net
> interface assigned the IP address used by MOL). NCSA telnet came with
> FTP server, I've used that a lot to copy stuff to or from Macs.
> Michael
> > > Hmmm... could I FTP to "myself"?
> > > i.e.: from the Linux side to the HFS+ side?
> > > Interesting concept, but nearly as straightford as it sounds, I'll bet.
> > That's of course possible with MOL. Might requite ethertap (a fake net
> > interface assigned the IP address used by MOL). NCSA telnet came with
> > FTP server, I've used that a lot to copy stuff to or from Macs.
> > Michael
> > I have XHFS running on my Yellow Dog Linux 2.0 (It came installed with it.)
> > Works with HFS+.
> So it's built into the YDL kernal?
Michael
1. BASIC: Moving files between Mac OS and Linux
It's a lot easier if you just run xhfs (I think you have to be root,
tho').
--
--------------------
Matthew Pritzker Graduate Research Assistant
3. is it possible to move linux files on C:(msdoss) to hda2 ?
4. ##ONLY## Mandrake PPC 9.1 on 8600/250 (Old world)
5. Howto burn real Mac HFS CDRs on PC Linux
7. linuxppc/mac-on-linux problem: hfs boot disk corruption
8. xvtdl ToDo-List Manager anybody?
9. Linux x86 and Mac HFS filesystems
10. Mac floppies under Linux HFS support?
11. question:hfs (MAC) acces and LINUX?
12. Drive Format Utility and Linux(HFS+ > HFS?)
13. HFS/HFS+ support options on (RH6.0) Linux?