[ ... ]
What do you think that the number of blocks reported by df -v "should be"?Quote:> Everything seems to function well, but the total number of
>blocks reported by df -v is exactly twice that of what it should be for the
>new drive array as well as the original 1GB drive.
It sounds as if you may not realise that df reports free space in terms
of 512 byte blocks, *not* 1024 byte blocks - see the df man page for more