>>> >WABI is pretty much a dead end, as far as I can tell, although it's still
>>> >a listed product.
>>> Why do you come to this conclusion?
>>I am quite sure I heard, at the Gemini Fast Track sessions,
>That explains a thing or two...
>>that WABI would not survive in the merged product.
>Interesting. I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that Wabi
>was only ever ported to OpenServer but never UnixWare.
I can't imagine it would be that hard to port from one to the other, not
really.
Quote:>I wonder if some other OEM (or Sunsoft itself) might make Wabi available
>for Gemini. After all, Wabi itself isn't going away, just SCO's OEMing
>of it.
Well, Redhat is working with Sunsoft right now. Apparently WABI is very
soon to be available for Linux, commercially. Was it Redhat or Caldera????
Hmm, can't remember now; drat.
Quote:>Conceptually, IMO Wabi is a better technology than Merge; but will they
>ever pull it off right?
It definately is better, conceptually. But in practice, Merge seems to
be a better solution. I say this because of compatibility.
--
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------
\
| Mark A. Davis | Lake Taylor Hospital | Norfolk,VA (757)-461-5001x431 |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------------/