by stacktrac » Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:38:37
Does anyone have a preference of one over the other? If so, why? Or
perhaps there's a better third option?
Regards,
stacktrace
by Henriq » Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:20:03
> Does anyone have a preference of one over the other? If so, why? Or
> perhaps there's a better third option?
by MJ Ra » Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:03:42
by Douglas Clinto » Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:11:13
> Does anyone have a preference of one over the other? If so, why? Or
> perhaps there's a better third option?
> Regards,
> stacktrace
--
GNU/Linux is God
get used to it
by stacktrac » Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:18:35
stacktrace
1. Great Flamewars of Our Time - Tanenbaum vs. Torvalds
Hi,
I'v been coming back to this from time to time so I thought
I'd index it for easier reading:
http://www.lh.umu.se/~bjorn/mhonarc-files/obsolete/
This is from the very beginning of linux when discussions
was still taking place in comp.os.minix. And discussion
it was! A few quotes out of context:
Linus, still a simple student:
"Your job is being a professor and researcher: That's one
hell of a good excuse for some of the brain-damages of minix.
I can only hope (and assume) that Amoeba doesn't suck like
minix does."
Andy, used to taking care of them:
"Writing a new OS only for the 386 in 1991 gets you your second
'F' for this term. But if you do real well on the final exam,
you can still pass the course."
Aiiee!
But the really interesting question is about this message from Ken
Thompson:
http://www.lh.umu.se/~bjorn/mhonarc-files/obsolete/msg00015.html
Is this Ken Thompson possibly *the* Ken Thompson?! :)
Also, the article is cut in half. Anyone have the first part?
/Bjorn
2. What do you use a modem for on your Unix system?
3. Archive of Torvalds/Tanenbaum discussion?
4. Question
5. Modern Operating System - Tanenbaum
6. Virtual Disk for root partition
7. Archives of Torvalds/Tanenbaum discussion?
9. archive of discussion Tanenbaum vs. Torvalds?
10. The Torvalds/Tanenbaum Debate: Never Resolved? Is microkernel better