by Gero Guenth » Wed, 28 Apr 1993 01:19:58
I was no kernal bug, but a tricky X - problem with the old (versionQuote:>I v just compiled .99pl8 with nfs,dos,minix,ext,xiafs sup. ,
>irq auto detect, 20 MB RAM.
>The .99.pl8 has a load of 3 with no (CPU consuming) processes running
!!!!
>This has to be a heavy bug because the .99pl7A kernel is clean!
With many thanxs for recogniz n
Gero
P.S. keep on hacking
I v just compiled .99pl8 with nfs,dos,minix,ext,xiafs sup. ,
irq auto detect, 20 MB RAM.
The .99.pl8 has a load of 3 with no (CPU consuming) processes running
!!!!
This has to be a heavy bug because the .99pl7A kernel is clean!
(the space engineer)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(it's NeXT mail too)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3. Warning: kernel .99pl8 has a heavy bug
5. proposal: feed smaller mailing lists into linux-kernel, add linux-kernel-core and linux-kernel-bugs
7. Bug in kernel logging; wide-spread device driver bug
8. ** Needing a free C obfuscator **
9. bug in 2.4.18 (xfs tree), kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:82!
10. Debian has 10,000+ bugs not including kernel bugs!!
12. Kernel bug, X11 bug, or my brain on X?
13. Kernel bug... or Hardware bug ? ... Help