Very Computer

by **Dan Don** » Tue, 27 Apr 1993 14:42:59

Hello all. I get the following error when compiling p9 both from the patch and the full source:

fork.c: In function `sys_fork':
fork.c:132: `clone_page_tables' undeclared (first use this function)
fork.c:132: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fork.c:132: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [fork.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/kernel'
make: *** [linuxsubdirs] Error 1

I have made all the necessary links, etc. I found the #define for clone_page_tables, but dont
know whats wrong with it. Can anyone help?

Thanks in advance,

Dan D.

by **Juha Lai** » Wed, 28 Apr 1993 23:02:09

>Hello all. I get the following error when compiling p9 both from the patch and the full source:

>fork.c: In function `sys_fork':
>fork.c:132: `clone_page_tables' undeclared (first use this function)
...etc.

>I have made all the necessary links, etc. I found the #define for clone_page_tables, but dont
>know whats wrong with it. Can anyone help?

Strange. I just installed the 0.99pl9 full source, then 'make config',
'make dep' and 'make'. No problems.

..Wolf

by **Ching-Hsiang Ch** » Thu, 29 Apr 1993 01:54:47

>>Hello all. I get the following error when compiling p9 both from the patch and the full source:

>>fork.c: In function `sys_fork':
>>fork.c:132: `clone_page_tables' undeclared (first use this function)
>...etc.

>>I have made all the necessary links, etc. I found the #define for clone_page_tables, but dont
>>know whats wrong with it. Can anyone help?

>Strange. I just installed the 0.99pl9 full source, then 'make config',
>'make dep' and 'make'. No problems.

>..Wolf

This may have something to do with the order people install new GCC and
Linux kernel source. It happen to me when I install recent GCC lib update
AFTER kernel patch 0.99 p8. I just re-install the whole kernal source
(or only the include/ part will be enough) and the problem went away.
Hope this help.

Steve

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Department of Statistics, Florida State University
-----------------------------------------------------------------

by **Dan Don** » Fri, 30 Apr 1993 05:08:52

Many thanks to the numerous replies I've gotten, everyone on this channel is very helpful.
It turns out the problem was that I applied the p9 patch to the MCC kernel source. Instead
of having links made from /usr/src/linux-mcc, the mcc release had moved the files to
/usr/include, etc. It was stupid of me to not recognize this right away. I just didn't
expect MCC to be set up this way!

Anyway, I learned my lesson. Verify that what you think you have done (links, etc) has
really happened.

Again, thanks to everyone, there are far to many to list!

Dan

Very Computer

Problem compiling 99.p9

Problem compiling 99.p9

Problem compiling 99.p9

Problem compiling 99.p9

Problem compiling 99.p9