Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by Advocate O » Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:16:39



Time to fight back through the correct channels...

<http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26433.html>

Large quote follows:

<quote>
Be it resolved that we, the people, both US citizens and citizens from
abroad, hereby declare the following:

(1.) That an unconditional boycott must be made against key firms,
particularly the BSA, RIAA, and MPAA, in an effort to encourage the
establishment of fair and honest business practices, and to promote
nondiscriminatory relations with regard to customers and end-users;

(2.) We demand the retraction or striking down of all
counterproductive legislation such as the DMCA, and reserve the right
to demand such for any similar article or document from the present,
past, or future;

(3.) We refuse to recognize any media or content distribution or
creation entity as a legitimate law enforcement agency;

(3[i].)-- no entity besides the rightful government of a state will be
granted law enforcement powers by the State, as the establishment of
such would forseeably undermine citizens' freedoms and democratic
rights;

(3[ii])-- no entity shall be granted any form of vigilante powers
under any circumstance, by any other entity or the State, as this is
strongly contrary to what a legitimate and free democracy should stand
for.

(4.) We reserve the right to enjoy the provisions of "First Sale" and
"Fair Use" protected under existing national and international
copyright conventions;

(5.) We find the passing of legislation which allows crime to be
legitimized for any agency for the purpose of personal gain to be
utterly intolerable.

(6.) In the event that any entity, corporate or otherwise, is granted
any piece of blatantly oppressive legislation or vigilante rights,
such as the right to commit a federal computer crime with impunity,
the citizens of all nations reserve the right to:

(6[i])-- declare a state of war against that entity and any parties
that share responsibility, whereby "war" is defined as the right to
assume equal rights as those which the oppressor has enacted, and in
doing so, the citizens are entitled to commit at least one retaliatory
act in return for every act made by the "oppressing" entity;

(6[i][a])--- any such state of war will remain in full force until the
legislation or grant of power in question has been reversed or struck
down and is completely eliminated. Proof of such elimination will be
required in all instances

</quote>

Chew on this one... :)

Advocate One

 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by WarpKa » Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:32:31



> Time to fight back through the correct channels...

> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26433.html>

> Large quote follows:

> <quote>
> (6.) In the event that any entity, corporate or otherwise, is granted
> any piece of blatantly oppressive legislation or vigilante rights, such
> as the right to commit a federal computer crime with impunity, the
> citizens of all nations reserve the right to:

> (6[i])-- declare a state of war against that entity and any parties that
> share responsibility, whereby "war" is defined as the right to assume
> equal rights as those which the oppressor has enacted, and in doing so,
> the citizens are entitled to commit at least one retaliatory act in
> return for every act made by the "oppressing" entity;

> (6[i][a])--- any such state of war will remain in full force until the
> legislation or grant of power in question has been reversed or struck
> down and is completely eliminated. Proof of such elimination will be
> required in all instances

> </quote>

> Chew on this one... :)

> Advocate One

I've made it clear that anyone who attacks me will get a retaliatory
strike by me in return, 10 fold.  This includes any corporate entity that
I do not recognize as being legitimate law enforcement.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
From the Linux Box of WarpKat

NOTE:   Emails containing 5E562BFA anywhere in the subject
line are considered "legitimate" emails and will get first
priority.     If you're a spammer, chances are, you'll get
seriously ignored.
-----------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by GeneralP » Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:56:24


On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:32:31 GMT, WarpKat assert()ed:


>> Time to fight back through the correct channels...

>> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26433.html>

>> Large quote follows:

>> <quote>

>> (6.) In the event that any entity, corporate or otherwise, is granted
>> any piece of blatantly oppressive legislation or vigilante rights, such
>> as the right to commit a federal computer crime with impunity, the
>> citizens of all nations reserve the right to:

>> (6[i])-- declare a state of war against that entity and any parties that
>> share responsibility, whereby "war" is defined as the right to assume
>> equal rights as those which the oppressor has enacted, and in doing so,
>> the citizens are entitled to commit at least one retaliatory act in
>> return for every act made by the "oppressing" entity;

>> (6[i][a])--- any such state of war will remain in full force until the
>> legislation or grant of power in question has been reversed or struck
>> down and is completely eliminated. Proof of such elimination will be
>> required in all instances

>> </quote>

>> Chew on this one... :)

>> Advocate One

> I've made it clear that anyone who attacks me will get a retaliatory
> strike by me in return, 10 fold.  This includes any corporate entity that
> I do not recognize as being legitimate law enforcement.

We're all so scared by your 1337 5|<R!p7Z we'd never think of attacking you.
 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by Donovan Rebbech » Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:45:59




Quote:> Time to fight back through the correct channels...

><http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26433.html>

> Large quote follows:

[snip]

This neither goes through "the correct channels", nor shows much promise.

The way to enact change is to make it clear to the legislators that they *will*
lose votes if they pass this.

Creating a copyright "hall of shame" would be a good start. Mailing your
senator and/or representative would also help.

Nothing you do will stop companies pushing for laws that are clearly in their
interests. Companies are not democracies, and aren't required to answer to you.

On the other hand, legislators are democratically elected. You *can* withdraw
your support for a legislator, and if you can mobilise enough votes, this *is*
an effective strategy. There are numerous interest groups that have succesfully
campaigned on their ability to mobilise votes as opposed to their ability to
contribute campaign dollars. Campaign dollars will not do a whole lot of good
if all of your supporters are desserting you.

--
Donovan

 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by WarpKa » Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:20:17



>> I've made it clear that anyone who attacks me will get a retaliatory
>> strike by me in return, 10 fold.  This includes any corporate entity
>> that I do not recognize as being legitimate law enforcement.

> We're all so scared by your 1337 5|<R!p7Z we'd never think of attacking
> you.

You should be.  I had chili for lunch.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
                              From the Linux Box of WarpKat


-----------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by Nucleo » Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:47:35



> Time to fight back through the correct channels...

> <http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/26433.html>

> Large quote follows:

> <quote>
> Be it resolved that we, the people, both US citizens and citizens from
> abroad, hereby declare the following:

> (1.) That an unconditional boycott must be made against key firms,
> particularly the BSA, RIAA, and MPAA, in an effort to encourage the
> establishment of fair and honest business practices, and to promote
> nondiscriminatory relations with regard to customers and end-users;

> (2.) We demand the retraction or striking down of all counterproductive
> legislation such as the DMCA, and reserve the right to demand such for
> any similar article or document from the present, past, or future;

> (3.) We refuse to recognize any media or content distribution or
> creation entity as a legitimate law enforcement agency;

> (3[i].)-- no entity besides the rightful government of a state will be
> granted law enforcement powers by the State, as the establishment of
> such would forseeably undermine citizens' freedoms and democratic
> rights;

> (3[ii])-- no entity shall be granted any form of vigilante powers under
> any circumstance, by any other entity or the State, as this is strongly
> contrary to what a legitimate and free democracy should stand for.

> (4.) We reserve the right to enjoy the provisions of "First Sale" and
> "Fair Use" protected under existing national and international copyright
> conventions;

> (5.) We find the passing of legislation which allows crime to be
> legitimized for any agency for the purpose of personal gain to be
> utterly intolerable.

> (6.) In the event that any entity, corporate or otherwise, is granted
> any piece of blatantly oppressive legislation or vigilante rights, such
> as the right to commit a federal computer crime with impunity, the
> citizens of all nations reserve the right to:

> (6[i])-- declare a state of war against that entity and any parties that
> share responsibility, whereby "war" is defined as the right to assume
> equal rights as those which the oppressor has enacted, and in doing so,
> the citizens are entitled to commit at least one retaliatory act in
> return for every act made by the "oppressing" entity;

> (6[i][a])--- any such state of war will remain in full force until the
> legislation or grant of power in question has been reversed or struck
> down and is completely eliminated. Proof of such elimination will be
> required in all instances

> </quote>

> Chew on this one... :)

> Advocate One

I don't know about the constitution-style writing, but I totally agree.
It's about time someone stood up for these principles, so far we have
lost fair use, *limited* copyright terms, ability to resell, and we are
now losing our right to fair trial, freedom from illegal search and
siesure, and government protection against vigilante frontier justice.

--
Nucleon, RLU #278930, <http://counter.li.org/>

Try not!  Do! or do not.  There is no try.
 -- Yoda

 
 
 

Citizens' Open Declaration Against Corporate Injustice

Post by Seymour » Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:14:33




Quote:>It's not practical to boycott all members of (for example) the RIAA.
>Nearly all music that is recorded and released comes from an RIAA
>label.

CDs and DVDs are not a necessity of life. Maybe people won't get angry
enough to boycott the RIAA, but it is certainly practical for them to
do so if they choose.

Quote:>However, I was referring mostly to the part about "declaring war".
>"Retaliatory" acts will just make those involved look like common
>criminals, and no-one will care when they are sent to prison.

Who says that retaliatory acts have to be criminal? The RIAA has other
legislative agenda where they have less leverage; lobby against
everything they want. If you have to buy music, buy it from foreign
studios. Start creating alternative distribution channels for artists
who don't want to be ripped off by the studios. Try to find
incriminating information about members and turn it over to the
authorities. Sue them the first time they step over the line.

Some of these may not be practical, but I'm sure that there are many
others that I've overlooked. Be creative. Keep it legal, but don't be
concerned about hurting their tender little feelings.

--
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2, Team OS/2, Team PL/I

Any unsolicited commercial junk E-mail will be subject to legal
action.  I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any
abusive E-mail.

I mangled my E-mail address to foil automated spammers; reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do not

 
 
 

1. Microsoft's Propaganda War Against Linux And Open Source

A partial chronology:

04/10/1998
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=
352E3B66.9B9C4384%40memra.com

11/09/2000
(Read around the Dutch comments on this one.)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=
slrn97bi12.36g.spamtrap%40dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl

11/23/2000
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/14955.html

11/28/2000
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/15040.html

01/31/2001
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,41527,00.html

02/15/2001
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4833927.html?tag=owv

04/30/2001
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/18589.html

06/14/2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=

08/23/2001
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/
134332634_microlob23.html

09/27/2001
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/21899.html

11/12/2001
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22770.html

01/02/2002
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23518.html

http://www.opensource.org/halloween
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/not-the-osi/halloween-rant.html
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/not-the-osi/halloween-nightmare.html

http://www.vcnet.com/bms/departments/dirtytricks.shtml

2. solaris 9, NIS, passwd.adjunct break passwd cmd

3. Open Source Solution Required: Issuing 100 million secure voter ID cards to the citizens of Bangladesh

4. great chance for FreeBSD to gain publicity ...

5. Myth - Corporate usage of Open Source (freeware)

6. where are lpr's locks?

7. implicit declaration of function 'inet_ntoa'

8. Anyone else find finger misbehaving?

9. 'implicit declaration' question

10. Corporate Open Source software usage?

11. Citizen number 219067949, it's time for your SPONGE BATH!

12. Declaration concerning the Unix 'daemons'

13. POSIX gurus: an 'environ' declaration question