I Nuked Linux...Win 2K is Light Years Ahead.

I Nuked Linux...Win 2K is Light Years Ahead.

Post by Mig Mi » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00



Hey Steve, Ishmeal etc.

How about doing some roaming - use the GRIC dialer. This way you can use
some dialup POP not located in New York area.
That would ad to your credibility... you would at least have done an effort
to conceal your identity

Cheers


> Been trying to run Linux for about a month now and
> am getting sick and tired of it crashing,*
> and just plain running like shit on my puter'.

> Scurried down to my local shop and picked up
> Windows 2000 Professional the other day and I have
> not looked buck.

> Windows 2000 now occupppies the 15 gigabyte hard
> drive Linux used to inhibit.

> Foalks it is not even close. Windows just bloows
> away Linux for so many reesons I haven't the time
> to rite them all here.

> I am puzzzlled why anyon would voluntarilly want
> to run such a peece of diss-jointed garbadge as
> linux?
> Much less pay $79.00 for RedHatt.

> I'm happily watching Jerry Springer re-runs on my
> TV card while i am typing this. Of curse the card
> is not soppurted with linuxx.

> DIE-LINUX-DIE....LONG LIVE
> WINDOWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> BET THAT SCRUED UP UR STINKY LINUX NEWSREEDERS.

Nope :-)
 
 
 

1. I Nuked Linux...Win 2K is Light Years Ahead.

I am NOT a Linux advocate (in fact, certainly
dislike certain aspects of it.)  Stability
of the system shouldn't be an issue at all, the
OS is definitely not unstable in competent hands,
on quality hardware.

Even though I don't like how it works,  it does
what it does, VERY VERY well.

One major aspect of commodity computer stability
is that different pieces of hardware can be
exercised differently by different OSes.  Free
OSes often FULLY exercise your hardware (in fact,
free OS developers often review the software
VERY carefully for performance and other such
enhancements.)  It is likely that Linux is
exercising a bug in your hardware...

Commercial code is mostly NOT a labor of love,
and careful optimization of the software with
full utilization of hardware isn't in the cards
with commercial development.  I suggest that you
be wary of the hardware that Linux has been failing
for you on, and look forward to some spectacular
crashes -- NO MATTER WHAT OS YOU ARE USING.

It sometimes takes a month, or sometimes a year for
hardware related failures to occur.

In responding to this, I am assuming that your complaint
isn't a troll!!!  My kindly advice is to review the
hardware and to try to diagnose it's failures before
depending too much on the reliability and/or stability
of your system...  In the longer term, it makes little or
no difference as to which OS you are running, given
faulty hardware.  With your described short-term
observations, you have seen a problem while running
Linux, and switching OS is only an expedient (but
not likely a complete) solution.

Good luck!!!

--
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,

                      | and it irritates the pig.

2. ftp %done script needed

3. Installing Linux on a Win ME + Win 2K dual booting system

4. Performance tips wanted for Linux PPP

5. Solaris 2.6 Fixes year 2K probs; does Linux suffer the same probs

6. How do I setup more than 1 guest FTP account?

7. Linux and Year 2K

8. DEC Ethernet?

9. UDB (Multia) clock is 20 years ahead during install

10. redhat 7.2 and win 2k pro-->boot loaders do not recognize win 200

11. Running LPR printer (old Genicom text shuttle printer) from Win 2K client through Win NT server

12. Gateway 2K (1.5 year old) SB Pro+MitsumiFX001 doesn't work?

13. Year 2k