Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Nomen Nesci » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 08:30:16





> > So one the one hand you have the technically aware user who can compile
> > their own kernel on their homebuilt box while on the other you have the
> > great unwashed that definately could not (and never will) handle having to
> > manually edit myriads of files and *all over the place just to get
> > filesharing working. They either are not technically minded or they simply
> > can't be *ed putting the time in to learn how as they have other
> > things they'd like to do with their lives. I mean, just because you want to
> > buy and drive a car doesn't mean you'll have to know how to  tune it or
> > rebuild the transmission yourself.

> You take the car on service for that. Or if you want to upgrade the
> transmision.

> Why wouldn't a user take his Linux machines on service when he wants
> upgrade the kernel or install some software? Why would they only do that
> for hardware problems? (As some experienced users add a card or change a
> harddisk themselves, other experienced users would upgrade the kernel
> themselves.)

because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
first place
ya retard
                        jackie 'anakin' tokeman

men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Aaron R. Kulki » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 10:03:17





> > > So one the one hand you have the technically aware user who can compile
> > > their own kernel on their homebuilt box while on the other you have the
> > > great unwashed that definately could not (and never will) handle having to
> > > manually edit myriads of files and *all over the place just to get
> > > filesharing working. They either are not technically minded or they simply
> > > can't be *ed putting the time in to learn how as they have other
> > > things they'd like to do with their lives. I mean, just because you want to
> > > buy and drive a car doesn't mean you'll have to know how to  tune it or
> > > rebuild the transmission yourself.

> > You take the car on service for that. Or if you want to upgrade the
> > transmision.

> > Why wouldn't a user take his Linux machines on service when he wants
> > upgrade the kernel or install some software? Why would they only do that
> > for hardware problems? (As some experienced users add a card or change a
> > harddisk themselves, other experienced users would upgrade the kernel
> > themselves.)

> because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> first place
> ya retard

Actually, since Linux can be administrated remotely, there's no reason
for the machine to be taken in...and most things can be solved within
a few minutes' time...which, even at the high hourly rates that Unix
administration skills are worth...is STILL cheaper to solve than a
LoseDOS problem

Hope that helps.

Jackie...for someone who claims to be an independant thinker, and really
up on the latest news,  you really cling to some very, very old lies that
all originate from the ultimate in "borg"-like orgainizations...Mafia$oft.

Quote:>                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> more even than death
> - bertrand russell

--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we



K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,

J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.

F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   *ery while concurrently committing *ery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.

C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Matthew Gardine » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 12:43:04


<snype>
Quote:

> because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> first place
> ya retard
>                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> more even than death
> - bertrand russell

Upgrading a kernel. Well, I have SUSE Linux, I goto the suse ftp site,
download the latest rpm kernel, drop into super user mode, then rpm -Uvh
kernel.rpm and voila, reboot, and I have a new kernel.  Is it that hard,
no, so stop spreading FUD on issues you have no experience.

Matthew Gardiner

--
I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell)

If you don't like it, you can go [# rm -rf /home/luser] yourself

Running SuSE Linux 7.1

The best of German engineering, now in software form

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Chris Ahlstro » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:47:58



> because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> first place
> ya retard
>                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> more even than death
> - bertrand russell

Oh, you cad, quoting Dirty Bertie!

Anyway, upgrading a kernel is pretty easy.  In fact, you can have an
unlimited choice of kernels at boot time, and also FreeBSD, et al.

Jackie, you're regressing!

--
"Where do you want to hang today?"

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Nomen Nesci » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:00:05



Quote:> <snype>

> > because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> > first place
> > ya retard
> >                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> > men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> > more even than death
> > - bertrand russell
> Upgrading a kernel. Well, I have SUSE Linux, I goto the suse ftp site,
> download the latest rpm kernel, drop into super user mode, then rpm -Uvh
> kernel.rpm and voila, reboot, and I have a new kernel.  Is it that hard,
> no, so stop spreading FUD on issues you have no experience.

why look, it's another lying sack of shit unix headcase! he snips the
context and then accuses me of ignorance! way to go *head. if you
ever wonder why linux has gone nowhere with endusers reread yourself.
                        jackie 'anakin' tokeman

men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Ian Dav » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:37:05




>> <snype>

>> > because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
>> > first place
>> > ya retard
>> >                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

>> > men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
>> > more even than death
>> > - bertrand russell
>> Upgrading a kernel. Well, I have SUSE Linux, I goto the suse ftp site,
>> download the latest rpm kernel, drop into super user mode, then rpm -Uvh
>> kernel.rpm and voila, reboot, and I have a new kernel.  Is it that hard,
>> no, so stop spreading FUD on issues you have no experience.

>why look, it's another lying sack of shit unix headcase! he snips the
>context and then accuses me of ignorance! way to go *head. if you
>ever wonder why linux has gone nowhere with endusers reread yourself.

We should just count ourselves lucky we don't have you as an advocate...
you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important, take a
few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.

ian.


/(&)\  http://www.veryComputer.com/(art)
 | |

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Nomen Nesci » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:20:06





> >> <snype>

> >> > because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> >> > first place
> >> > ya retard
> >> >                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> >> > men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> >> > more even than death
> >> > - bertrand russell
> >> Upgrading a kernel. Well, I have SUSE Linux, I goto the suse ftp site,
> >> download the latest rpm kernel, drop into super user mode, then rpm -Uvh
> >> kernel.rpm and voila, reboot, and I have a new kernel.  Is it that hard,
> >> no, so stop spreading FUD on issues you have no experience.

> >why look, it's another lying sack of shit unix headcase! he snips the
> >context and then accuses me of ignorance! way to go *head. if you
> >ever wonder why linux has gone nowhere with endusers reread yourself.

> We should just count ourselves lucky we don't have you as an advocate...

i don't do advocacy dimwit

Quote:> you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important, take a
> few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.

you write like a *
                        jackie 'anakin' tokeman

men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Matthew Gardine » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:28:03






> > >> <snype>

> > >> > because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> > >> > first place
> > >> > ya retard
> > >> >                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

> > >> > men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> > >> > more even than death
> > >> > - bertrand russell
> > >> Upgrading a kernel. Well, I have SUSE Linux, I goto the suse ftp site,
> > >> download the latest rpm kernel, drop into super user mode, then rpm -Uvh
> > >> kernel.rpm and voila, reboot, and I have a new kernel.  Is it that hard,
> > >> no, so stop spreading FUD on issues you have no experience.

> > >why look, it's another lying sack of shit unix headcase! he snips the
> > >context and then accuses me of ignorance! way to go *head. if you
> > >ever wonder why linux has gone nowhere with endusers reread yourself.

> > We should just count ourselves lucky we don't have you as an advocate...

> i don't do advocacy dimwit

> > you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important, take a
> > few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.

> you write like a *
>                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman

Now that wasn't called for :(

Matthew Gardiner

--
I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell)

If you don't like it, you can go [# rm -rf /home/luser] yourself

Running SuSE Linux 7.1

The best of German engineering, now in software form

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Ian Dav » Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:46:14



>> you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important, take a
>> few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.

>you write like a *

You write like someone who doubts their *ity, it's normally the ones in
the closet who go around calling everyone else *.

ian.


/(&)\  http://www.veryComputer.com/(art)
 | |

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by alla » Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:48:52


Just cool down here guys.  This is supposed to be "support" newsgroup




> >> you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important,
take a
> >> few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.

> >you write like a *

> You write like someone who doubts their *ity, it's normally the ones
in
> the closet who go around calling everyone else *.

> ian.

>  \ /

> /(&)\  http://www.veryComputer.com/(art)
>  | |

 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Chad Evere » Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:36:12




>> We should just count ourselves lucky we don't have you as an advocate...

>i don't do advocacy dimwit
>                        jackie 'anakin' tokeman

Boy, isn't that the truth.  You write like a welfare recipient.
 
 
 

Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop

Post by Steve Chan » Sun, 22 Apr 2001 04:40:51


Poodoo:

No matter what the subject is
you know more about it than he does.
HTH

-- Steve

===============================

This site is just TOO COOL for a counter! http://www.self-acceptance.org
"As long as an enemy is judged solely by his
appearance, his victory is assured." - Outer Limits

 
 
 

1. Windows domination of the desktop can only decline

The "desktop" is a consumer's phenomenon, and it has reached a
maturity that makes future innovations less and less relevant to the
millions of computer owners who just want to do basic surfing, email
and word processing.  For several years those basic functions have
been in place, to the long-term satisfaction of 99% of computer
owners.

Therefore, the market for the desktop will, in the future, be
influenced far more by factors other than new functionality.  --
Like price.  Like friendliness.  

Linux offers now and will offer with increasing ease-of-use the full
functionality that the consumer needs 99.99% of the time.  And it does
so with total freedom to copy and share the software among friends and
family.  That means there is a sharing, social component to the use of
Linux that Microsoft will not provide.  This is what Richard Stallman
writes about, and I agree.

Microsoft cannot win, because Microsoft wants the world and the
consumer to be a way that the man-in-the-street does not want to be.
That is the blindness that comes with hubris and greed.  So, welcome
to the future, Billy; your nemesis is a fat, satisfied little penguin.

Tim Beckham

2. Keyboards and RSI

3. MS promotes Linux from threat to 'the' threat - Memo

4. Termio(4) C I/O Question

5. The real threat to Linux desktop success. . . the Internet

6. problem with Sound Blaster

7. MS moves to head off Linux desktop 'threat'

8. Linux TCP - unexpected retransmissions

9. Microsoft: Linux on desktops a threat

10. Linux not currently a threat to Windows

11. Linux: a threat to Microsoft (was: Microsoft to make Windows-specific Java)

12. Best column ever on why windows is better for the desktop

13. Why are slow window managers and desktops slow?