by paul cook » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 01:37:46
why are you cross-posting purely Linux security advisories into the XPQuote:> Brought to you as a public service.
> That's two in one day.
> When will it end?
> Security Advisory - RHSA-2002:222-21
--
Paul Cooke
Registered Linux user 273897 Machine registration number 156819
Linux Counter: Home Page = http://counter.li.org/
11:35pm up 14 days, 11:39, 3 users, load average: 0.24, 0.30, 0.24
by Peter K?hlman » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 01:48:50
>>to propose the following:
>>> Brought to you as a public service.
>>> That's two in one day.
>>> When will it end?
>>> Security Advisory - RHSA-2002:222-21
>>why are you cross-posting purely Linux security advisories into the XP
>>group??? They won't want to see them.
> Lot's of them run Linux as well.
by Jeff » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 02:11:28
>> Brought to you as a public service.
>> That's two in one day.
>> When will it end?
>> Security Advisory - RHSA-2002:222-21
> why are you cross-posting purely Linux security advisories into the XP
> group??? They won't want to see them.
by Mark » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 02:48:07
>>Brought to you as a public service.
>>That's two in one day.
>>When will it end?
> Makes you wonder how many security holes there are in
> software where the vendor only tells you about them as
> a last resort.
by Jeff » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 02:44:35
You mean most M$ admins that have no fscking clue what they are doing.Quote:> BTW, based on most of the attacks that have caused damage, most sys admins
> seem to be seriously lacking in checking for updates.
Ha!! What the fsck do you know about data centers? This is funny someQuote:> In addition, as further proof of your having never been even close to a
> glass house data center, most large data centers, especially those with
> multiple sites, have very strict rules and procedures (change management )
> in place that dictate what/when/where and how systems get upgraded.
> Meaning, one just doesn't "upgrade" a system at will simply because RH or
> otherwise issues an advisory.
Go get a life you stupid fsck want to be IT admin!!Quote:> But seeing as you are a 13 year old script kidde, you wouldn't have a clue
> about that.
> Back to your bunker idiot
by Rick » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:03:40
>>Brought to you as a public service.
>>That's two in one day.
>>When will it end?
> Makes you wonder how many security holes there are in software where the
> vendor only tells you about them as a last resort.
Since I registered my distro, I get reports from Red Hat emailed to me.
--
Rick
by alw » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:04:58
How many security patches has M$ released?
We really need your retarded public services.
by Rob Hughe » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:23:18
>> Brought to you as a public service.
>> That's two in one day.
>> When will it end?
> Why don't you post Microsoft security anouncements? And then you could
> post a running total of M$ vs Red Hat.
> How many security patches has M$ released?
> We really need your retarded public services.
--
Remember: the only difference between
being the champ and the chump is u.
by Rob Hughe » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:24:03
>>Brought to you as a public service.
>>That's two in one day.
>>When will it end?
> Makes you wonder how many security holes there are in
> software where the vendor only tells you about them as
> a last resort.
--
Remember: the only difference between
being the champ and the chump is u.
by Rob Hughe » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:25:56
> FWIW I was well above an I/T (get it right next time please) admin when I
> left the industry and retired.
--
Remember: the only difference between
being the champ and the chump is u.
by cybea » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:47:10
>>> Brought to you as a public service.
>>> That's two in one day.
>>> When will it end?
>> Why don't you post Microsoft security anouncements? And then you could
>> post a running total of M$ vs Red Hat.
>> How many security patches has M$ released?
>> We really need your retarded public services.
> And since he still thinks every GNU app bundled with a typical Linux
> distrobution is part of the OS, let's make sure we include IIS, Office,
> SQL, ISA, Outlook, IE, OE, etc., etc.
Why would you think there would be any bug or security issues with Outlook?
Doesn't MS fix all the bugs in its software right away?
end
by Roy Cull » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:49:10
>>Go get a life you stupid fsck want to be IT admin!!
> Typical Linonut envy.
> FWIW I was well above an I/T (get it right next time please) admin
> when I left the industry and retired.
The problem is the rate of MS security patches and the fact that theyQuote:> You obviously haven't a clue as to what change management is about
> which is why you try to cloud the reply with insults.
Now I've been a *nix admin for well over 10 years and I've never come
across a security patch that didn't fix what it was meant to fix with
no undesired side effects. There again I very rarely need to install
security patches because most of them are for packages that aren't
installed on the systems I admin. These are stripped down hardened
systems.
That is why I have time to learn about new things relating to my job
and keep up to date in my field.
Well it sounds like you are so out of date that anything you say isQuote:> It's a common defense mechanism of the ill informed, of which you are the
> current president, at least in COLA.
> It's obvious you have never worked in the industry.
end
by Roy Cull » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:56:45
>>>Brought to you as a public service.
>>>That's two in one day.
>>>When will it end?
>> Makes you wonder how many security holes there are in software where the
>> vendor only tells you about them as a last resort.
> That is micros$oft, dumbass.
> Since I registered my distro, I get reports from Red Hat emailed to me.
end
by Rick » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 05:07:41
>>>>> Brought to you as a public service.
>>>>> That's two in one day.
>>>>> When will it end?
>>>> Why don't you post Microsoft security anouncements? And then you could
>>>> post a running total of M$ vs Red Hat.
>>>> How many security patches has M$ released?
>>>> We really need your retarded public services.
>>> And since he still thinks every GNU app bundled with a typical Linux
>>> distrobution is part of the OS, let's make sure we include IIS, Office,
>>> SQL, ISA, Outlook, IE, OE, etc., etc.
>>Why would you think there would be any bug or security issues with
>>Outlook? Doesn't MS fix all the bugs in its software right away?
> 95 percent of the desktop market.
--
Rick
by Roy Cull » Sun, 16 Feb 2003 05:20:36
>> Brought to you as a public service. That's two in one day. When
>> will it end?
> Why don't you post Microsoft security anouncements? And then you
> could post a running total of M$ vs Red Hat.
MS SW is fundamentally flawed. They have admitted it themselves and
stated it would take years to fix it. Years? Pull the other one. Only
a rewrite with security in mind will fix it. Oh, that's exactly what
they are doing.
What about BG's leaked email about trustworthy computing. A whole
month when development was stopped to scour the code for security
exploits. The result? Another security announcement with about 10
security bugs patched. Brilliant no? No. Of those exploits only a
couple were found by MS. So the thousands of MS SW engineers who
produced the code found about 1/5 the number of security exploits
that others without access to even the code found!
Who cares. They just keep coming and coming. Glad I'm not a MSQuote:> How many security patches has M$ released?
It's a shame when someones mental faculties start to fail them.Quote:> We really need your retarded public services.
end
1. Yet another Redhat security advisory.
1) The found it. 2) They fixed it. 3) There seems to have been no actual
attacks using it, at least on a widespread basis.
At least it can be done without a reboot.
--
When will men learn that all races are equally inferior to robots?
2:37:32 up 3:41, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.07
RX bytes:24163155 (23.0 Mb) TX bytes:2123502 (2.0 Mb)
E-mail address munged to prevent spam.
2. Logical Volumes and Journaled FS
4. Encapsulation of boot drives in Volume Manager
5. And still yet another RHN Linux Security Alert
6. Writing to parallel port in Linux.
7. RHN Linux Security Alert yet again!
8. Binaries for Khoros (1.0.5 or 2.0) available?
9. Yet another Linux Security Advisory.
10. Oh My, yet still ANOTHER Linux Security issue.
11. Yet another Solaris PPP problem, as yet unanswered
12. are the header file and compiler problems fixed yet in RedHat 7.0?
13. Yet another NTP/Redhat problem