Very Computer

by **John Hil** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

The article uses the phrase "Anyone with half a brain knows that Windows NT
is unable to handle the same loads UNIX can"

Is this conclusive proof that S has'nt even got half a brain ?

>S,
> Please look at the following URL:

>http://news.tucows.com/ext2/99/10/articles/ext210081999.shtml

>--
>J. J. Horner (REMOVE NOSPAM before replying)

>System has been up
> 4:15pm up 5 days, 13 min, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.17,
>0.14

by S » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

THE TRUTH IS:

proof & url:

http://www.statmarket.com/SM?c=Operating_System

who puts the l in luv MSFT :))

> S,
> Please look at the following URL:

> http://news.tucows.com/ext2/99/10/articles/ext210081999.shtml

> --
> J. J. Horner (REMOVE NOSPAM before replying)

> System has been up
> 4:15pm up 5 days, 13 min, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.17,
> 0.14

by **cbass2..** » Sun, 31 Dec 1899 09:00:00

Quote:> THE TRUTH IS:

> proof & url:

> http://www.statmarket.com/SM?c=Operating_System

Proof? Of what, exactly? That most kidz surfin' the 'net use kewl
windoze? That MS does indeed have a monopoly on the desktop?

What?

Quote:> who puts the l in luv MSFT :))

Ah, a Gates Perv, eh? Wink wink nudge nudge!

-- snip --

Curtis

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

To S, a dose of your own medicine