Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by S. Mer » Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:45:11



I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally
after placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really
happen? Has it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic
evidence of this occuring?

S. Merde

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by Nigel Feltha » Fri, 28 Dec 2001 16:26:27



> I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally
> after placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really
> happen? Has it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic
> evidence of this occuring?

> S. Merde

Just go away - if you are that interested in*s then use alt.gay
newsgroups instead of posting this *here.

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by Peter K?hlman » Fri, 28 Dec 2001 16:29:48



> I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally
> after placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really
> happen? Has it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic
> evidence of this occuring?

Have you stopped raping your mother lately?

Peter
--
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change,
the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the
bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off.

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by Ivan Kell » Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:25:20



> I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally after
> placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really happen? Has
> it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic evidence of this
> occuring?

personnally i prefer to open the cdrom drive. lob my lad in there and
close it. a lot more effective. now * off back to alt.gay.**er
Quote:

> S. Merde

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by S. Mer » Sat, 29 Dec 2001 01:00:22




> > I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally
> > after placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really
> > happen? Has it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic
> > evidence of this occuring?

> Have you stopped raping your mother lately?

> Peter

Actually, no, I haven't. Have you?

S. Merde

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by Danny B » Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:01:33



Quote:> I've heard rumors about geeks circumcising themselves accidentally
> after placing a Linux distro CD-R on their pecker. Can this really
> happen? Has it happened to anyone here? Is there any photographic
> evidence of this occuring?

Please mention what distribution you are using if you want to get help here.

Are you using a distro that offers installation support?  Did you call or
e-mail them?

Perhaps you should submit your question to Ask Slashdot?

I would make the observation that Linux developers need to take steps to
ensure that future Linux CD's are safer in this regard than other kinds of
CD's.

Finally, I would suggest that if the extent of your injuries are an
accidential circumcision, that perhaps in the future you might try forcing a
lubricated set of Linux CD's into another orrifice.  I suggest you use Linux
for this because distros often come with a larger number of CD's than
Windows.  Once you obtain data from your experiments, plese don't post them
here.

Danny

 
 
 

Circumcision via a Linux distro CD-R.

Post by Plasm » Sat, 29 Dec 2001 07:41:37



>> Have you stopped raping your mother lately?

>> Peter

> Actually, no, I haven't. Have you?

> S. Merde

From the Jargon File:

mu /moo/

 The correct answer to the classic trick question
   "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?".  Assuming that you
   have no wife or you have never beaten your wife, the answer "yes"
   is wrong because it implies that you used to beat your wife and
   then stopped, but "no" is worse because it suggests that you have
   one and are still beating her.  According to various Discordians
   and Douglas Hofstadter the correct answer is usually "mu", a
   Japanese word alleged to mean "Your question cannot be answered
   because it depends on incorrect assumptions".  Hackers tend to be
   sensitive to logical inadequacies in language, and many have
   adopted this suggestion with enthusiasm.  The word `mu' is
   actually from Chinese, meaning `nothing'; it is used in
   mainstream Japanese in that sense, but native speakers do not
   recognize the Discordian question-denying use.  It almost certainly
   derives from overgeneralization of the answer in the following
   well-known Rinzei Zen koan:

A monk asked Joshu, "Does a dog have the Buddha nature?"
Joshu retorted, "Mu!"

Therefore, I choose to answer "mu"

--
GCS/J d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++S+ P+ L+++(++)>+++++$ E---- W++ N+ o? K?
w+>--- O !M-- V-- PS+(-) PE- Y-- PGP- t+>++ 5>+ X R>+ tv+ b++(+++)
DI++++ D++ G e>+++ h! r-- y?