Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Borg » Tue, 26 Nov 1996 04:00:00



Hi,

Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
read more upon the subject at:

http://www.pcweek.com/opinion/1125/25week.html

Regards,

--
#include <disclaimer.h>  |   *Good pings come in small packets*
     Vlad Petersen       |     Linux: multiuser, multitasking,
     Vancouver, B.C      |     multiplatform, 64-bit and free.

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Des Herrio » Wed, 27 Nov 1996 04:00:00




Quote:> Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
> lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
> Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
> Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
> read more upon the subject at:

Saddening, but hardly surprising.  We all know how MS like to subvert
the good work of other companies for their own gain.  I for one will
never be running it on my PC.  (Hey, once I get my hands on a RedHat
4.0 CD, my PC will be completely cured of the MS virus :-)

Seriously though, as far as I'm concerned, MS can do what they like.
There's enough Linux hackers in the world now to come up something
better. And it will be better, because software written for fun and for
free is nicer to use than proprietary software, even it isn't always as
polished (or in Microsoft's case, cutesy, which is not the same thing).

--
Des Herriott


 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Dennis Iannic » Wed, 27 Nov 1996 04:00:00


: Hi,
:
: Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
: lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
: Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
: Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
: read more upon the subject at:
:
: http://www.pcweek.com/opinion/1125/25week.html

        Ooooh.. looks like Microsoft's idiotic thinking may signal the end
of their empire.  Building Java applications that ONLY run under Windows
is about as idiotic as having an html "standard" that only works with
Windows.. Have they finally flipped their lids?  It's like they're
reinventing the English alphabet but leaving out the letter Q and X
because "well.. we just don't see a significant marketshare for these
letters.. we'd much rather see people put their resources towards
developing new words using the other 24 letters.  Yes.. we do understand
that the rest of the world will continue to use all 26 letters but we feel
they'll eventually see the light and come to realize our way is the best
way." ;)

--
--------------------------

Blinky lights are the essence of technology!
Caffeine underflow (brain dumped)

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by david parso » Wed, 27 Nov 1996 04:00:00





>: Hi,
>:
>: Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
>: lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
>: Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
>: Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
>: read more upon the subject at:
>:
>: http://www.pcweek.com/opinion/1125/25week.html

>    Ooooh.. looks like Microsoft's idiotic thinking may signal the end
>of their empire.  Building Java applications that ONLY run under Windows
>is about as idiotic as having an html "standard" that only works with
>Windows..

It does seem rather pointless, unless Microsoft is planning on pushing
Windows onto platforms other than the x86 family.  If they are, what
better than to push their developers into generating pcode, then merely
moving the base OS over to those PowerPC Macs that are currently being
left alone to distract the antitrust people?

                 ____

                  \/

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by James Seymo » Thu, 28 Nov 1996 04:00:00





>> Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
>> lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
>> Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
>> Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
>> read more upon the subject at:

>Saddening, but hardly surprising.  We all know how MS like to subvert
>the good work of other companies for their own gain.  I for one will
>never be running it on my PC.  (Hey, once I get my hands on a RedHat
>4.0 CD, my PC will be completely cured of the MS virus :-)

[snip]

You can de-louse your environment even further: get rid of the "Intel"
part of Wintel, too :-).

Regards,
Jim
--
Jim Seymour                     | "With [Microsoft's] ActiveX, you just need a

Systems & Network Administrator |  OLE server running.  But you get what you
Medar, Inc., 38700 Grand River  |  pay for." -- Albert Eng, Dir. of Financial
Ave., Farmington Hills, MI.     |  Technology, Canadian Imp. Bank of Commerce.

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Jonathan H. Picka » Fri, 29 Nov 1996 04:00:00




>It does seem rather pointless, unless Microsoft is planning on pushing
>Windows onto platforms other than the x86 family.  If they are, what
>better than to push their developers into generating pcode, then merely
>moving the base OS over to those PowerPC Macs that are currently being
>left alone to distract the antitrust people?

1. NT is apparently Microsoft's next "buy or die" product.
2. NT already runs on x86, DEC Alpha, and MIPS systems.
3. It wouldn't be unreasonable to expect NT-PPC to come into existence before
   3q 1997, if it isn't already.

>                 ____

>                  \/

-jhp
(so is Dave Cutler gonna lobby for a VAX port?)
--
Jon Pickard * 149 Olive #45 * Paso Robles CA 93446 * +1 805 2399518 * 6372F5B9
*     linux hacker * perl lover * database toyer-with * bofh in training     *
*    all spam gleefully forwarded to your postmaster for a nominal charge    *
*          the above are almost certainly not the opinions of TCSN           *
 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Christopher Roba » Sat, 30 Nov 1996 04:00:00



Quote:Seymour) writes:

:>



:>>> Looks like Microsuck is again coming up with their own
:>>> lame and crippled standards. Let's not allow it to kill
:>>> Java that we know and like. We all know Microcreeps from
:>>> Redmond hate UNIX, OS2, Mac and "other guys" and you can
:>>> read more upon the subject at:
:>>
:>>Saddening, but hardly surprising.  We all know how MS like to subvert
:>>the good work of other companies for their own gain.  I for one will
:>>never be running it on my PC.  (Hey, once I get my hands on a RedHat
:>>4.0 CD, my PC will be completely cured of the MS virus :-)
:>[snip]
:>
:>You can de-louse your environment even further: get rid of the "Intel"
:>part of Wintel, too :-).
:>

I don't know if running a Cyrix counts.

But the Linux guys will have another platform to run as soon as
the PowerPC microkernel Linux project is done
(http://www.mklinux.apple.com) or something like that with links
coming out from Apple Devworld.

Rgds,

Chris

In the center lies the equilibrium of all four elements.  
Its element is Earth, and its star is Saturn.  
Water extinguishes Fire which melts Metal which
cuts Wood which covers Earth which absorbs Water.

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Mike Coh » Sat, 30 Nov 1996 04:00:00



Quote:

> 1. NT is apparently Microsoft's next "buy or die" product.
> 2. NT already runs on x86, DEC Alpha, and MIPS systems.
> 3. It wouldn't be unreasonable to expect NT-PPC to come into existence before
>    3q 1997, if it isn't already.

NT already runs on PPCs - I saw it last June (on a Motorola PPC box).
When PPCP boxes are available sometime next year, you'll be able to run
BE-OS, MacOS, and NT on the same system.

I think they dropped the MIPS version of NT.

--


[ Have a clear mind, be pure in your heart - Youssou N'dour, "Set"  ]
** Junk mail not accepted - to reply copy my email address from my .sig

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Axel Bold » Tue, 03 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Quote:> And the Linux server for Mach makes Linux feasible on a *lot* of
> hardware

I've heard that before, the general idea being that Mach runs
everywhere and Linux runs on Mach... But is it really true? Does
MkLinux really run as a server on every Mach micro kernel that's out
there? Or is it more of a theoretical possibility that still needs
some serious hacking?

Axel

--

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Christian Brue » Thu, 05 Dec 1996 04:00:00




> > And the Linux server for Mach makes Linux feasible on a *lot* of
> > hardware

> I've heard that before, the general idea being that Mach runs
> everywhere and Linux runs on Mach... But is it really true? Does
> MkLinux really run as a server on every Mach micro kernel that's out
> there? Or is it more of a theoretical possibility that still needs
> some serious hacking?

> Axel

> --


There is still a little bit of machine dependant code in the linux
server, mainly for signals and syscalls glue as well as some critical
time routines (bitmaps, checksums, ...). This is a two weeks work
if you already have the OSF Mach kernel running. Other versions of
the kernel (Utah's Mach4, CMU) would need serious hacking.

 Christian

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by Axel Bold » Fri, 06 Dec 1996 04:00:00




> > Does
> > MkLinux really run as a server on every Mach micro kernel that's out
> > there? Or is it more of a theoretical possibility that still needs
> > some serious hacking?

> There is still a little bit of machine dependant code in the linux
> server, mainly for signals and syscalls glue as well as some critical
> time routines (bitmaps, checksums, ...). This is a two weeks work
> if you already have the OSF Mach kernel running. Other versions of
> the kernel (Utah's Mach4, CMU) would need serious hacking.

Sounds cool. What's the license on OSF Mach like?

Axel

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by tgM » Sat, 07 Dec 1996 04:00:00


Yesterday I stopped by Computer Literacy Bookshop, and there on display
were shiny new CD ROMs, each emblazoned with both the Apple Computer
Logo and the Linux Penguin logo. The label says MkLinux "brought to
you by Apple Computer". This must be the fruit of the Apple Computer
alliance with the OSF to bring Linux to the Power Mac. Price tag said
twenty dollars. I gathered from the label that this CD ROM is also being
distributed with the cooperation of Prime Time Freeware.

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by DAVID A GATWO » Sun, 08 Dec 1996 04:00:00


: Yesterday I stopped by Computer Literacy Bookshop, and there on display
: were shiny new CD ROMs, each emblazoned with both the Apple Computer
: Logo and the Linux Penguin logo. The label says MkLinux "brought to
: you by Apple Computer". This must be the fruit of the Apple Computer
: alliance with the OSF to bring Linux to the Power Mac. Price tag said
: twenty dollars. I gathered from the label that this CD ROM is also being
: distributed with the cooperation of Prime Time Freeware.

Yup.  That would be DR2 (Developer Release 2).  They're not up to a reference
release, and it only works on the first generation and a half of PowerMacs,
and still using Linux 1.2.x, but all that changes sometime very soon.  The
version to support PCI PowerMacs may be available online in a "bleeding
edge" beta as early as the end of next week (this according to Michael Burg),
and Linux 2.0 based betas are already floating around (the PCI Beta is 2.0,
I believe), and RR1 should follow shortly thereafter, after the beta bugs are
cleaned up.

As for the quality...  I'm using DR1 still, and it's fairly stable (about 90%
of boots survive until I shut down hours later, on occasion it will just die,
but that's several months of bug fixes behind.  :-)

Seems pretty promising.

--
 /---------------------------------------------------------------------\
|David A. Gatwood             And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,  |


|http://mars.utm.edu/~davagatw -or- http://nox.cs.du.edu:8001/~dgatwood |
 \---------------------------------------------------------------------/

 
 
 

Say NO to MicroSuck's proprietary Java version!

Post by tomlins » Sun, 08 Dec 1996 04:00:00



: As for the quality...  I'm using DR1 still, and it's fairly stable (about 90%
: of boots survive until I shut down hours later, on occasion it will just die,
: but that's several months of bug fixes behind.  :-)

I use DR2 on a fairly regular basis, having obtained in in a less
elegant manner (i. e. took my hard drive to SDSU and downloaded it :)
It's been rock-solid with no unexpected crashes.  I've managed to do
some dumb things that brought mkLinux down (once I tried to call
execvp() with an argument list that lacked a null terminator.  That
caused a "kernel panic", a forced reboot, and I had to run fsck()
manually to fix the file system.)

My biggest beef with mkLinux as it stands right now is trivial:
the super-crude boot loader.  You get two options--a dialog box
that defaults to mkLinux after 10 seconds, or no mkLinux at all.
And should mkLinux not be able to boot (e. g. if Mac VM is turned
on) it flashes a modal dialog box _during boot_.  Stupid, stupid--
hasn't Apple said that flashing a dialog box during INIT time is
something that you should never do?  Isn't that what the Notification
Manager is for??

Cheers,
-et
--
Ernest S. Tomlinson     | And still another opinion...

------------------------+ AN AMERICAN."  - Charles Foster Kane

 
 
 

1. 'mount' say NO iso9660 support and 'cat /proc/filesystems' say YES!!!

Hello

While I was fighting to get the CDROM (Sony CDU76E ATAPI CD) to be mounted
I found in the README file in device dir that the ATAPI CDs connected to the
second IDE interface should be drived by /dev/hdc, when I did and mount gives
this message

mount: iso9660 is not supported bt this kernel.

I installed InfoMagic Slakeware 2.2.1 (March 95 CDs).
While The kernel say it knows about the iso9660. I did

cat  /proc/filesystems

and iso9660 appeared as a block fs.

Before the /cdrom was linked to /dev/hd1a  ( done by the setup) and I was
getting the message

mount: /dev/hd1a is not a block device.

Any Clue.

I'm going to install the 1.2.10 kernel.

Thanks
Mostafa

2. Computer case info request..

3. select() says there's data, read() says there isn't

4. SoundBlaster-16, no SCSI support?

5. EBUSY on open

6. Java, Java, Java, Java, Java, Java .....

7. LILO and more than two partitions on one hd.

8. Changing Serial Nos using 'brand'

9. PCWEEK : Arron Goldberg says it's all Java

10. java/47447: linux-sun-jdk1.4.1: java command can't find java.lang.Object

11. Communicator's Java breaks on Tarantella site, Hot Java's worse

12. Error: Wrong version of [$JAVAHOME/]java for this version of AIX.