Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Sun, 11 Aug 2002 05:22:17





> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> Yes, rather easily.  It's Microsoft's W2KAS (Worthless 2000 Kludgey
> * Shit) that's giving me the fits with networking.  Does MSFT design
> all their *to be intentionally incompatible with 3Com and Cisco and
> Nortel or is this just another 'accident'?

*ing hell, yet another linux * who thinks the post was a sleight
against linux. It was a question about the OP's intelligence, you brain-dead
dumb*.

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by sh0tgu » Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:14:40





>> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
> network
>> three computers all using W2k............

> Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> --
> Kadaitcha Man
> Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

A moderator that uses Outlook
Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

phew......Thanks for the joke

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by m-marcel » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:03:32


outlook express has a nice newsreader...

-a|ex





> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
> > network
> >> three computers all using W2k............

> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> > --
> > Kadaitcha Man
> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> A moderator that uses Outlook
> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> phew......Thanks for the joke

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:58:20






> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
> > network
> >> three computers all using W2k............

> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> > --
> > Kadaitcha Man
> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> A moderator that uses Outlook
> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> phew......Thanks for the joke

You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an answer to
the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to engage in
'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to do in
life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is better."
Tell some*who gives a *.

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Sinister Midge » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:42:41


On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






>> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
>> > network
>> >> three computers all using W2k............

>> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

>> > --
>> > Kadaitcha Man
>> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
>> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

>> A moderator that uses Outlook
>> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

>> phew......Thanks for the joke

> You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an answer to
> the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to engage in
> 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to do in
> life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is better."
> Tell some*who gives a *.

Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
(dim)wits.

Quote:> --
> Kadaitcha Man
> Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Sinister Midget
Moderate? Ha, ha

--
Windows is not a virus, because a virus is well programmed and comes
for free.

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 04:29:09



> On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






> >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
> >> > network
> >> >> three computers all using W2k............

> >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> >> > --
> >> > Kadaitcha Man
> >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> >> A moderator that uses Outlook
> >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> >> phew......Thanks for the joke

> > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an answer
to
> > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to engage in
> > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to do in
> > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
better."
> > Tell some*who gives a *.

> Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
> (dim)wits.

Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed Windows
was better than Linux.

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by GreyClou » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:41:14





> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






> > >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
> > >> > network
> > >> >> three computers all using W2k............

> > >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> > >> > --
> > >> > Kadaitcha Man
> > >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> > >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> > >> A moderator that uses Outlook
> > >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> > >> phew......Thanks for the joke

> > > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an answer
> to
> > > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to engage in
> > > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> > > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to do in
> > > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
> better."
> > > Tell some*who gives a *.

> > Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
> > (dim)wits.

> Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed Windows
> was better than Linux.

Well, which is it??
 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by GreyClou » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:42:10



> outlook express has a nice newsreader...

Now tell me where is in XP.  My friend bought a computer
with XP and can't find the damn newsreader.
 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:50:06






> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






> > > >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have
managed to
> > > >> > network
> > > >> >> three computers all using W2k............

> > > >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Kadaitcha Man
> > > >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> > > >> A moderator that uses Outlook
> > > >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> > > >> phew......Thanks for the joke

> > > > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an
answer
> > to
> > > > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to
engage in
> > > > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> > > > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to
do in
> > > > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
> > better."
> > > > Tell some*who gives a *.

> > > Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
> > > (dim)wits.

> > Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed
Windows
> > was better than Linux.

> Well, which is it??

What the * are you gibbering on about, retard?

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Sinister Midge » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:47:09


On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:42:10 -0500, GreyCloud claimed:


>> outlook express has a nice newsreader...

> Now tell me where is in XP.  My friend bought a computer with XP and can't
> find the damn newsreader.

I think they relabeled it so people knew what it was. Now it's called
'Viral-Infection Express' or somesuch. It's in the Malware folder.

--
Windows: Because everyone needs a good laugh.

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by GreyClou » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:28:59








> > > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






> > > > >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have
> managed to
> > > > >> > network
> > > > >> >> three computers all using W2k............

> > > > >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Kadaitcha Man
> > > > >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> > > > >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> > > > >> A moderator that uses Outlook
> > > > >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> > > > >> phew......Thanks for the joke

> > > > > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an
> answer
> > > to
> > > > > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to
> engage in
> > > > > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> > > > > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to
> do in
> > > > > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
> > > better."
> > > > > Tell some*who gives a *.

> > > > Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
> > > > (dim)wits.

> > > Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed
> Windows
> > > was better than Linux.

> > Well, which is it??

> What the * are you gibbering on about, retard?

Get real* head.  I notice that you must be a druggie
that can't answer a simple question.  Are you bombed??
 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by sh0tgu » Mon, 12 Aug 2002 19:27:30








>> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have managed to
>> > network
>> >> three computers all using W2k............

>> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

>> > --
>> > Kadaitcha Man
>> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
>> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

>> A moderator that uses Outlook
>> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

>> phew......Thanks for the joke

> You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an answer
> to the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to engage
> in 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to do in
> life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
> better." Tell some*who gives a *.

> --
> Kadaitcha Man
> Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
linux is  better
 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:41:53




> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better
> linux is  better

At what? Making you stupid?

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by GeneralP » Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:08:07


On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:20:06 +0930, Kadaitcha Man assert()ed:






>> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






>> > > >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have
> managed to
>> > > >> > network
>> > > >> >> three computers all using W2k............

>> > > >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

>> > > >> > --
>> > > >> > Kadaitcha Man
>> > > >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
>> > > >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

>> > > >> A moderator that uses Outlook
>> > > >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

>> > > >> phew......Thanks for the joke

>> > > > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an
> answer
>> > to
>> > > > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to
> engage in
>> > > > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

>> > > > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better to
> do in
>> > > > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
>> > better."
>> > > > Tell some*who gives a *.

>> > > Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle of
>> > > (dim)wits.

>> > Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed
> Windows
>> > was better than Linux.

>> Well, which is it??

> What the * are you gibbering on about, retard?

Go away, Kocksmoker Man.

--
Man: Stu! You should buy that!
Stu: Hey: Disco Stu doesn't advertise.

 
 
 

Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Home Networking

Post by Kadaitcha Ma » Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:03:04



> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:20:06 +0930, Kadaitcha Man assert()ed:





> >> > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:58:20 -0500, Kadaitcha Man claimed:






> >> > > >> >> I know nothing about networking................But I have
> > managed to
> >> > > >> > network
> >> > > >> >> three computers all using W2k............

> >> > > >> > Could you have done the same with [L]eunux?

> >> > > >> > --
> >> > > >> > Kadaitcha Man
> >> > > >> > Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
> >> > > >> > Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

> >> > > >> A moderator that uses Outlook
> >> > > >> Express..............bwaaaahahahahahahahaha........

> >> > > >> phew......Thanks for the joke

> >> > > > You know, that post is just another statistic in determining an
> > answer
> >> > to
> >> > > > the question, "Is it true that linuxfux are far more likely to
> > engage in
> >> > > > 'Linux is better than Windows' arguments?"

> >> > > > You're all a bunch of *ing no-hopers who have nothing better
to
> > do in
> >> > > > life than run around in ever decreasing circles yelling "linux is
> >> > better."
> >> > > > Tell some*who gives a *.

> >> > > Very well. You win. You can go away now, the victor in the battle
of
> >> > > (dim)wits.

> >> > Really? First you'd better you post proof of where I ever claimed
> > Windows
> >> > was better than Linux.

> >> Well, which is it??

> > What the * are you gibbering on about, retard?

> Go away, Kocksmoker Man.

If I admit to being "Kocksmoker Man," will you admit to not knowing what the
OP was gibbering on about?

--
Kadaitcha Man
Moderator: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: comp.os.linux.advocacy

 
 
 

1. Networking Linux Redhat 8.0 & Windows 2000 Pro On Dynamic Based Network

   Anyone happen to know where I can find information on networking a Redhat
8.0 machine with a Windows 2000 machine on a network where:

Windows 2000 sees internal LAN fine
Windows 2000 sees outside world fine

Windows 2000 obtains IP address automatically
Windows 2000 obtains DNS server address automatically
DHCP Enabled

In an environment where linux wants to have its own static ip number and
specified domain name, how do i get it to share its hard drive contents with
this windows 2000 machine?

Anyone got any helpful ideas or websites??? Help is much appreciated..

Thomas Jackson

2. Font corruption

3. XP Pro versus Home versus 2000

4. NIS setup

5. Wishlists for Linux AND Windows 2000 (was Re: Wishlists for Linux (vs) Windows 2000)

6. Manipulating Shadow File

7. Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK

8. Zugangskontrolle

9. I need help with networking Windows 2000 Pro with Red Hat 7.2

10. Network problem: GNU/Linux [Debian] <=> Windows XP Pro

11. Samba 2.2.2 on FreeBSD 4.5 with Windows 2000 / XP Clients - Add user script problem.

12. Microsoft Windows XP/2000/ME/98/95 - Software from MikeSoft

13. So is Windows XP faster or slower than 98/ME/2000?