I got a phone call from the author of the article in less than
an hour after I sent them an email. He seemed to be confused
on exactly what "VA Linux" was providing. The incorrect paragraph
suggests that "VA Linux" is developing new expensive hardware
components that are neccesary for Linux to run on.
He wants to do a correction to the article. I answered some
questions and later sent him an email.
It would be nice if somebody with more time and knowledge than me
can send him an email explaining why different hardware components
may be desireable for a PC running Linux than a PC running Windows.
And also what added value is provided by VA Linux.
The text of the email that I sent him appears below.
Joe Mantle
> Borzou,
> Linux works with a very large number of "IBM-compatible" components.
> A hardware configuration (i.e., a set of components) that is optimized
> for Windows may not necessarily be optimized for Linux. For example,
> some very new hardware might not be supported under Linux. Alternately,
> Linux may perform 5% to 10% better than Windows for some configurations
> (i.e. SCSI hard disk, slower CPU, etc).
> The main point is that no new hardware components need to be developed
> for Linux. To the contrary, Linux has been developed to run on existing
> hardware.
> One can get more info on what hardware is prefered by linux by
> looking at the "PC-Clone Unix Hardware Buyer's Guide" by Eric
> S. Raymond (a well known Linux evangelist) at
> http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/clone-hw-guide/
> I am happy to see that you are interested in correcting the mistake
> in the article.
> Joe Mantle
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mechanical Engineering office: 217-333-5267 |
| University of Illinois home: 217-367-2918 |
| Urbana, Illinois, USA http://www.students.uiuc.edu/~w-mantle/ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+