http://www.linuxsucks.com/LinuxSucks.htm
> No fair linking stuff from 1999.
Welcome to my kill-file, kiddo.Quote:> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C2C4C6.BCB480F0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> http://www.linuxsucks.com/LinuxSucks.htm
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C2C4C6.BCB480F0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.linuxsucks.com/LinuxSucks.htm">http://www.linuxsucks.c=
> om/LinuxSucks.htm</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> ------=_NextPart_000_00AA_01C2C4C6.BCB480F0--
1. Crack5 - feedback for uncracked users
I'm sure I must be missing something really obvious - but I can't see
just at the moment how crack5 manages to maintain feedback about
"uncrackable" users. This was implicit in crack4.1.
I'd be very grateful for any words of wisdom on this topic.
Many thanks
Des
2. Strange message from strip.
3. I need a feedback from Varicad users.
5. For KPPP users: Feedback wanted!
7. Looking for feedback from Interix (aka OpenNT) users
8. 2+ Gb RAM
9. Feedback from RUN/RunShare (Helios speed-up) users
10. Info on MRTG 2.9.18 rpm: a user feedback!
11. WWW: Request for Feedback on WWW site on Linux distributions
12. rh linux kickstart and post install security change feedback needed
13. Request for Linux feedback