>>I will say that Win95 is not the best, but it is a far cry from Win31 and
>>heads above anything I have ever experienced with OS/2.
>>I have been running it for about a month now in a full alpha development
>>environment with VC++ v2.2 and have *never* had a crash. I would like to
>>think that says something for my programming ability, but that's not the
>>case. it also plays all the games and MPC apps that Win31 did, faster and
>>without *any* crashes.
than Win95 will ever be. I have trimmed it somewhat...
Second, you should learn to seperate your thoughts into some logical flow.
USENET is not "real-time" video.
I wish I had a 586. It is a plain-jane 486DX-33,8M RAM and a singleQuote:>I'd like to know how you got 95 to run software faster than 3.1?
>Everything I run is either slower or won't run... (or did you just upgrade to
>a Pentium and then install WIN95 and say WOW this is fast)... AVI's playback
>alot slower - well audio skips for split seconds now and then and a couple
>frames get dropped here and there (makes a big difference when you're
>outputting to tape)...
speed cd-ROM. Runs great! I get some audio skips, but had them in Win31
even worse. I can blame it on the single-speed cd drive.
If I was going to try to do broadcast video, I would expect I would use
a real machine, like an SGI, not a boatanchor PC or a MAC ;)
If you are saying that your OS/2 runs DOS apps 50%+ faster than native DOS,Quote:>WIN95 also partly installs in DOS (That says something
>about it being a new OS) it's basically DOS with a new WIN GUI and a few
>extra VxDs... You tell me what you'd use in my situation... I rendered an
>animation in 3DS (a DOS program) which lasts for about 1 minute and 40 seconds,
>there were 2500 frames (for 25fps PAL video). Now, before I rendered the
>animation I checked my options (because I knew 2500 would take a long time)
>and on average I found it took the computer just over 21 minutes to do each
>frame in DOS... If you calculate that out that equals about 5.2 weeks of the
>computer constantly running and calculating. Now let me shock you. I did it
>in just 2 weeks and 4 days... HOW? (no I didn't buy a faster machine) I used
>a different Operating System (/2). When time's money would you use a
>different OS if it could save you nearly 3 weeks? Well yes I was running 3DS
>in a DOS window in OS/2 Warp Connect (and I can even make a movie in
>Premiere at the same time as 3DS is rendering and do other things as well -
well, you will need to give me a minute to regain my composure after rolling
on the floor laughing ;)
Well, everything is slower under a multi-tasking emulated OS than it is inQuote:>(by the way in case you're wondering I wasn't able to run 3DS in Win95
>it wanted to run in a full DOS session - which reboots to DOS and says goodbye
>too all multitasking... I have heard of people who have finally got it to run
>but they say it's slower than in DOS
it's native environment.
Agreed, for me, it's a Linux machine . I use Win31/95 only for what IQuote:>I suppose it all depends on what you do with your machine when you decide
>what OS is best for you, but I don't believe there's one that fits all.
have too, and steer clear of anything that says IBM on the box ;)
Well, I know that my Win95 runs *every* DOS and Win16 app that I have thrownQuote:> In the end when we're all using WIN2000 who will care about
>WIN95 and OS/2??? (probably those trying to run WIN95 stuff on WIN2000 -
>backward compatibility from MS? - YEAH RIGHT! ;-)
at it, even applications that were custom built for Win31, like
Codewrite Fusion for VC++. I did not expect it to run, but was very
happy it did ;)
/---------------------------------------\ My opinions belong to me,
| Visit us at http://www.macshack.com | myself and I, not my employer,
\......................................./ the government or my wife...:)