>>>It was my understanding that the information on ones system is only
>>>sent if the user registers and indicates by checking a box that it is
>>>ok to report that information. It is not automatic, I don't believe.
>>That's their story - and of course, you accept it without question?
> if you answer ``no'' to the registration question, no scanning
>occurs. no directory structure or other local data is transfered. period.
>my concern is that one day this might not be the case. call me paranoid.
>i also truly believe that m/s has left back-door passwords in the
>m/s net shipped with win95, wfw, and nt. again, probably just paranoia.
> but...if this is the case, all m/s would need to do is send a command
>and instantly retrieve all information from all machines connected my
>the m/s net.
scanning of their dialin customers which raised a
big stink. This might be the reason why M$ is asking permission to
scan. I am paranoid enough (and perhaps a bit too hysterical) to believe
that my saying 'no' to the scan would completely disable the scan.
Is anyone aware of the results of the stink about Prodigy's supposedQuote:>will this ever happen. no. why? one of us paranoid folks would quickly
>discover it causing (1) a public relations nightmare, (2) <<LOTS>> of
>lawsuits, (3) gov't action
scanning and if any other of the services (AOL, Compuserve) have attempted
this? I don't think any company has any more right to sniff around on my
computer than they have the right to walk uninvited into my house to
search it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Standard Disclaimer: These views may not reflect my employer's views.
John Gossett Research Engineering Assistant
University of Texas: Applied Research Labs
My Disclaimer: I fully claim responsibility for the above views.
Quote: "Get over it!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------