Microsoft's solution to security

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Stephen How » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:09:58



Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
laugh.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

Stephen Howe

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Roy Cull » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 02:40:49




Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
> laugh.

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

Excellent, thats joe user sorted out. Now all they need to do is stop
the rest of the Internet from getting in and they will have earned the
trust they are looking for. :-)

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Scott A. Blyston » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 07:34:35


Thanks for the chuckle!


Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
> laugh.

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

> Stephen Howe

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Jim Richardso » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:26:30


On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:09:58 -0000,

Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
> laugh.

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

> Stephen Howe

wow, they want passwords to have 18770 characters? gee, I guess they are
getting serious about security :)

--
Jim Richardson
        Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
        Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Sean » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:38:48



Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
> laugh.

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

> Stephen Howe

What good is 18,770 characters when the rest of the system is so hack prone.

A password that long could never be entered correctly on the first try
unless it was either written down in front of you or it was copied and
pasted into the password field.

Was that a joke?

Sean

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by philicord » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:06:41


Quote:> Was that a joke?

No, it's a feature.
 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Amaz » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:21:24


Quote:>> Was that a joke?

> No, it's a feature.

No, it's a security enhancement.:-)
 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Sean Dundo » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:54:15





> > Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
> > laugh.

> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

> > Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

> Excellent, thats joe user sorted out. Now all they need to do is stop
> the rest of the Internet from getting in and they will have earned the
> trust they are looking for. :-)

I like the soultion almost as much as the problem.  It sounds like the
subtle Microsoft way of stating their Mission Statement in abridged
terms.  "Use of this product may cause the problem to be resolved, but
could, most likely, lead to others. <Small font>  Microsoft is not
lialbe for damages to your health in any way, including but not limited
to: insanity, counfusion, anger, stress or other problems.  Microsoft is
also not liable if your computer explodes or is thrown out the iwndow in
a fit of rage."  Now please enter your 18770 character password in order
to download this file.

Peace,
        --STD

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Jim Richardso » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:56:35


On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:38:48 -0500,




>> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
>> laugh.

>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

>> Stephen Howe

> What good is 18,770 characters when the rest of the system is so hack prone.

> A password that long could never be entered correctly on the first try
> unless it was either written down in front of you or it was copied and
> pasted into the password field.

> Was that a joke?

> Sean

Apparantly it's some sort of bug with their passwd equiv when using MIT
Kerberos authentication.

--
Jim Richardson
        Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
        Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Boris Dyni » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:51:11


Quote:> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop cross-posting to
nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your group of psychopaths.

Boris

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Jim Richardso » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:57:49


On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:51:11 GMT,

Quote:>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
> nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop cross-posting to
> nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your group of psychopaths.

> Boris

Hey Boris, tovarisch! long time no see... still have tourettes I see. Sad
that.

--
Jim Richardson
        Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
        Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Tsu Dho Nim » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:08:05



>Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site.  I had to
>laugh.

>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304

>Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.

The phrase "This fix may receive additional testing at a later
time" really makes me want to download and apply it!

Tsu Dho Nimh

--
"Y'know, I can *say* I'm Ming The Merciless, Emporer of Planet Mongo, but
unless I can produce a few legions of heavily-armed rocket ships, you're not
likely to take me seriously."  Morely Dotes, 2001

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Ian Pege » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:30:45



Quote:>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
> nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop
> cross-posting to nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your
> group of psychopaths.

...or you'll do what? Bozzer!

--

Ian - looking through a glass onion

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Bone » Sat, 26 Jan 2002 06:15:03




>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> wow, they want passwords to have 18770 characters? gee, I guess they are
> getting serious about security :)

Oh jeez, and all along I thought the security solution had something to do
with the fact that the site hasn't been accessible to me for 3 days.
Problem: Insecure web-server. Solution: Shut down web-server.

I guess I don't have an MS-approved web-browser.

--

Bones

The opinions stated here are my own, and do
not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

 
 
 

Microsoft's solution to security

Post by Rollo Toma » Sat, 26 Jan 2002 06:17:04



>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
>Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
>nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop cross-posting to
>nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your group of psychopaths.

>Boris

I can cross post to nt.advocacy because I'm running Windows XP Pro
as a guest OS under SuSE 7.3 Pro Linux  machine via VMware.  

Having Linux control your Windows XP is the only way to go.

 
 
 

1. Despite Security, Microsoft pitches 'no separate app server' approach

Coming so soon after Brian Valentine's grim admission concerning
the security of Microsoft's products ...
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1920216
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1252211
..., Bob O'Brien, Microsoft group product manager for the Windows
.Net Server division is still preaching the old "Having an
application server built into the operating system makes it fast,
makes it efficient, and makes it very simple for the customer to
maintain and that all translates to cost [savings]," line
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/09/06/020906hnnoappserver...

This dispite that it was one of the major security issues with
Microsoft's IIS
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1866,00.asp
and the rest of the Unix/BSD/Linux world are increasingly
isolating such exposed services
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/feature_stories/feature_story-99.html
and restricting their access to
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/index.html
the operating system.

David Mohring - Nothing learned, History doomed to repeat itself.

2. promiscuous mode

3. Microsoft hit new security 'level' :-)

4. Sec. Vulnerability OpenView NNM 6.1

5. Microsoft Users Upset With 'Security Updates'

6. Microsoft Serial mouse and X

7. Duh - Microsoft: "Our products aren't engineered for security"

8. mouse and X

9. Microsoft's monopoly threatens economic security: Gates

10. Forbes.com: Microsoft's security secret

11. 'all network ports in use' or 'no pty available' solution

12. Solution requested for a 'Couldn't get a free page.....' problem

13. a simple solution to the ``can't mv *.c *.old'' whine