Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
laugh.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
Stephen Howe
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
Stephen Howe
Excellent, thats joe user sorted out. Now all they need to do is stopQuote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
> laugh.
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
> laugh.
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Stephen Howe
wow, they want passwords to have 18770 characters? gee, I guess they areQuote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
> laugh.
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Stephen Howe
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
What good is 18,770 characters when the rest of the system is so hack prone.Quote:> Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
> laugh.
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Stephen Howe
A password that long could never be entered correctly on the first try
unless it was either written down in front of you or it was copied and
pasted into the password field.
Was that a joke?
Sean
No, it's a security enhancement.:-)Quote:>> Was that a joke?
> No, it's a feature.
> > Please check this out. Note, that is Microsoft's Support site. I had to
> > laugh.
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
> > Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Excellent, thats joe user sorted out. Now all they need to do is stop
> the rest of the Internet from getting in and they will have earned the
> trust they are looking for. :-)
Peace,
--STD
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
>> Stephen Howe
> What good is 18,770 characters when the rest of the system is so hack prone.
> A password that long could never be entered correctly on the first try
> unless it was either written down in front of you or it was copied and
> pasted into the password field.
> Was that a joke?
> Sean
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *whichQuote:> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
Boris
Hey Boris, tovarisch! long time no see... still have tourettes I see. SadQuote:>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
> nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop cross-posting to
> nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your group of psychopaths.
> Boris
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q276304
>Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
Tsu Dho Nimh
--
"Y'know, I can *say* I'm Ming The Merciless, Emporer of Planet Mongo, but
unless I can produce a few legions of heavily-armed rocket ships, you're not
likely to take me seriously." Morely Dotes, 2001
...or you'll do what? Bozzer!Quote:>> Does Linux have this type of security? If not, I would recommend it.
> Who cares what shitty Linux has or doesn't have. It's pile of *which
> nobody except the group of fanatics will ever use. And stop
> cross-posting to nt.advocacy . Keep you garbage for yourselves: your
> group of psychopaths.
--
Ian - looking through a glass onion
I guess I don't have an MS-approved web-browser.
--
Bones
The opinions stated here are my own, and do
not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
>Boris
Having Linux control your Windows XP is the only way to go.
1. Despite Security, Microsoft pitches 'no separate app server' approach
Coming so soon after Brian Valentine's grim admission concerning
the security of Microsoft's products ...
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1920216
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1252211
..., Bob O'Brien, Microsoft group product manager for the Windows
.Net Server division is still preaching the old "Having an
application server built into the operating system makes it fast,
makes it efficient, and makes it very simple for the customer to
maintain and that all translates to cost [savings]," line
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/09/06/020906hnnoappserver...
This dispite that it was one of the major security issues with
Microsoft's IIS
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1866,00.asp
and the rest of the Unix/BSD/Linux world are increasingly
isolating such exposed services
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/feature_stories/feature_story-99.html
and restricting their access to
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/index.html
the operating system.
David Mohring - Nothing learned, History doomed to repeat itself.
3. Microsoft hit new security 'level' :-)
4. Sec. Vulnerability OpenView NNM 6.1
5. Microsoft Users Upset With 'Security Updates'
6. Microsoft Serial mouse and X
7. Duh - Microsoft: "Our products aren't engineered for security"
8. mouse and X
9. Microsoft's monopoly threatens economic security: Gates
10. Forbes.com: Microsoft's security secret
11. 'all network ports in use' or 'no pty available' solution
12. Solution requested for a 'Couldn't get a free page.....' problem
13. a simple solution to the ``can't mv *.c *.old'' whine