Very Computer

by **Terry Port** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 01:45:08

http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

Market share for top servers across all domains,
August 1995 - January 2002

Active Sites

Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

Terry
--
Sig currently feeding the reaperbots:-

by **mugu_surfe** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 02:10:50

>http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

>Market share for top servers across all domains,
> August 1995 - January 2002

> Active Sites

>Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
>Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
>Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
>iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
>Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

>Terry

This does not necessarily mean that the server is a Linux server;
however, cool stats and a cool website.

vk

by **Linon** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:22:58

After takin' a swig o' grog, Terry Porter belched out this bit o' wisdom:

Quote:> http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

> Market share for top servers across all domains,
> August 1995 - January 2002

> Active Sites

> Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
> Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
> Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
> iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
> Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
a wee bit like a corpse.

Chris

--
A day without some form of UNIX sucks

by **WarpKa** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:28:03

>>http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

>>Market share for top servers across all domains,
>> August 1995 - January 2002

>> Active Sites

>>Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
>>Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
>>Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
>>iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
>>Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

>>Terry

> This does not necessarily mean that the server is a Linux server;
> however, cool stats and a cool website.

> vk

NetCraft is good for statistical information but they bombarded my servers
with requests for version information so I firewalled them up.

Add whatever percentage 8 more servers would put into Apache's favor.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From the Linux Box of WarpKat

Download my public key from:

or retrieve it from
http://www.keyserver.net as WarpKat
(Public Key expires 01/04/2003)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

by **Craig Kelle** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 06:53:12

> Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
> worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
> a wee bit like a corpse.

Well, the Gartner Group has advised that all their customers migrate
off IIS, so it's look like more than a corpse now. :)

--
It is financially more expensive to go to prison than to attend Harvard.

by **Tim Smit** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:24:23

Since Apache runs on almost all versions of Unix, and on Windows, how
is this a benefit of Linux? You are being hypocritical by posting so
many off topic posts after blasting others for doing that.

--Tim Smith

by **Tim Smit** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:30:03

>Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
>worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
>a wee bit like a corpse.

Huh? That's a strange way to read in *increase* in share.

You might want to go look at the graphs to see how the numbers change
over time. Graphs are available at http://www.netcraft.com/survey/.

--Tim Smith

by **Tim Smit** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:33:11

>Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
>worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
>a wee bit like a corpse.

Before anyone points out that there was a slight decrease in IIS share
over the last month, and wonders why the thing I just posted mentioned
an increase, go look at the graphs. The Dec 2001 --> Jan 2002
decrease is well within the normal month-to-month variation. The
overall trend is that Apache and IIS are going up, and Netscape is
going down the toilet.

--Tim Smith

by **Richard Stein** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 10:37:33

Here in comp.os.linux.advocacy,

>On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:45:08 +1100, in comp.os.linux.advocacy,

>> Active Sites

>>Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
>>Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
>>Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
>>iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
>>Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

>How do they actually get these statistics?

They explain it in some detail on their site.

Here's another (different) source:

http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/200201/index.html

Synopsis:

"Across All Domains

Market Share Change (Total servers: 4,830,270 )

Server1 January January December December Change
Count % Count %
Apache 3125701 64.71% 2833472 63.97% +0.74%
Microsoft 1239087 25.65% 1155119 26.08% -0.43%
Netscape 106075 2.20% 103198 2.33% -0.13%
Zeus 53470 1.11% 47762 1.08% +0.03%
WebSTAR 35868 0.74% 34265 0.77% -0.03%
WebSite 26558 0.55% 25814 0.58% -0.03%
Other 243511 5.04% 230066 5.19% -0.15%"

--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> http://www.visi.com/~rsteiner >>>---> Eden Prairie, MN
OS/2 + BeOS + Linux + Solaris + Win95 + WinNT4 + FreeBSD + DOS + PC/GEOS
+ Fusion + vMac + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven! :-)
Can Dukakis still drive that tank?

by **freefa** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 11:26:18

>http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

>Market share for top servers across all domains,
> August 1995 - January 2002

> Active Sites

>Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
>Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
>Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
>iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
>Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

>Terry
>--

http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/200201/IP_Address/index.html

Apache 20441 38.17% 18491 36.96% +1.21%
Microsoft 25201 47.05% 23976 47.93% -0.88%
Netscape 2002 3.74% 1942 3.88% -0.14%
Zeus 68 0.13% 62 0.12% +0.01%
WebSTAR 627 1.17% 616 1.23% -0.06%
WebSite 343 0.64% 327 0.65% -0.01%
Other 4876 9.10% 4613 9.22% -0.12%

On an IP basis MS still holds almost 50%. Netcraft also confirms this
but only show this in the archival data:

http://www.netcraft.com/Survey/index-200106.html

Quote from this page:

"Microsoft Windows has a significantly higher share of the web when
one counts by computer, rather than by host, as in the conventional
Web Server Survey. The survey shows 49% of the computers running the
web are Windows based; a little more than all of the Unix-like
operating systems combined. As some of the 3.6% of computers not
identified by Netcraft operating system detector will in reality be
Windows systems, it would be fair to say about 50% of public Web
Servers world-wide are run on Microsoft operating systems Although
Apache running on various Unix systems runs more sites than Windows,
Apache is heavily deployed at hosting companies and ISPs who strive to
run as many sites as possible on a single computer to save costs.
Windows is most popular with end-user and self hosted sites, where the
host to computer ratio is much smaller."

Almost %50 percent of web server administrators have chosen to run a
Microsoft platform.

When it comes to secure transactions Microsoft dominates:

http://www.netcraft.com/surveys/analysis/https/2001/Jan/CMatch/oscnt_...

by **yt..** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:12:36

>>http://www.netcraft.com/survey/

>>Market share for top servers across all domains,
>> August 1995 - January 2002

>> Active Sites

>>Developer December 2001 Percent January 2002 Percent Change
>>Apache 8588323 63.34 8997645 63.69 0.35
>>Microsoft 3609428 26.62 3683141 26.07 -0.55
>>iPlanet 383078 2.83 422806 2.99 0.16
>>Zeus 172352 1.27 171197 1.21 -0.06

>>Terry
>>--
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/200201/IP_Address/index.html
> Apache 20441 38.17% 18491 36.96% +1.21%
> Microsoft 25201 47.05% 23976 47.93% -0.88%
> Netscape 2002 3.74% 1942 3.88% -0.14%
> Zeus 68 0.13% 62 0.12% +0.01%
> WebSTAR 627 1.17% 616 1.23% -0.06%
> WebSite 343 0.64% 327 0.65% -0.01%
> Other 4876 9.10% 4613 9.22% -0.12%
> On an IP basis MS still holds almost 50%. Netcraft also confirms this
> but only show this in the archival data:

Alright, thats it. I'm tired of everyone misusing the term IP.

On an IP basis, microsoft does NIT hold more than 50%. You have it
exactly backwards. The reason for this is that you can easily host tens
of thousands of IPs on a single UNIX machine, and people do it all the time.

-----.

--
Theres a hole in the world like a great black pit and
its filled with people who are filled with shit and the
vermin of the world inhabit it

by **Linon** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:16:40

After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o' wisdom:

>>Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
>>worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
>>a wee bit like a corpse.

> Huh? That's a strange way to read in *increase* in share.

> You might want to go look at the graphs to see how the numbers change
> over time. Graphs are available at http://www.netcraft.com/survey/.

Look at the graph below the one to which you refer.

--
A day without some form of UNIX sucks

by **Charlie Eber** » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:54:34

> >Looks like the hacks, exploits, vulnerabilities, viruses,
> >worms, and bugs are taking their toll. IIS is looking
> >a wee bit like a corpse.

> Before anyone points out that there was a slight decrease in IIS share
> over the last month, and wonders why the thing I just posted mentioned
> an increase, go look at the graphs. The Dec 2001 --> Jan 2002
> decrease is well within the normal month-to-month variation. The
> overall trend is that Apache and IIS are going up, and Netscape is
> going down the toilet.

> --Tim Smith

Ah, no it isn't. Thanks for playing!

--
Charlie
http://24.94.230.113/Linux/intro.html
By 2005 Linux will be Dominate!

by **Paolo Ciambott** » Sun, 03 Feb 2002 02:36:08

> Alright, thats it. I'm tired of everyone misusing the term IP.

> On an IP basis, microsoft does NIT hold more than 50%. You have it
> exactly backwards. The reason for this is that you can easily host tens
> of thousands of IPs on a single UNIX machine, and people do it all the
> time.

So, what I understand from the server report is....

1. It takes many more Microsoft servers to host an equivalent number of
websites, and...

2. Most Microsoft-hosted websites are of the "my kid's first webpage"
variety.

Right?

by LF » Sun, 03 Feb 2002 02:29:10

>> Alright, thats it. I'm tired of everyone misusing the term IP.

>> On an IP basis, microsoft does NIT hold more than 50%. You have it
>> exactly backwards. The reason for this is that you can easily host tens
>> of thousands of IPs on a single UNIX machine, and people do it all the
>> time.

> So, what I understand from the server report is....

> 1. It takes many more Microsoft servers to host an equivalent number of
> websites, and...

> 2. Most Microsoft-hosted websites are of the "my kid's first webpage"
> variety.

> Right?

Well you know the MS recommendation-only one major task (app) per server.

--
It's not the paint that matters...it's whats under the hood!

LedFut

Very Computer

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !

Apache 63%, Microsoft 26% !