http://www.opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.html
There is also a legal dictionary available here ...
http://www.duhaime.org/diction.htm
if you need it which helps define some of the legal terms used in the paper.
http://www.opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.html
There is also a legal dictionary available here ...
http://www.duhaime.org/diction.htm
if you need it which helps define some of the legal terms used in the paper.
1. OSI Position Paper on the SCO-vs.-IBM Complaint
For those following the SCO vs IBM issue, I think this (long) page
can be interesting.
http://www.opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.html
begin quote
----------------------
"It is not within OSI's competence or knowledge to address the specifics
of the business relationship between SCO/Caldera and IBM, or the terms
of their contract. It is, however, very much within our competence to
observe that SCO/Caldera's complaint depends critically on certain
historical and technical assertions which are materially false and
(apparently quite intentionally) misleading.
Unlike SCO/Caldera's complaint, we have provided direct hyperlinks to
browseable versions of all the sources which back our facts."
----------------------
end quote
Marcello
--
"Linux is built to be used, Windows is built to be sold" (seen in COLAdv)
Visit http://www.geocities.com/match_97
marcello (dot) romani (at) libero (dot) it
2. Solaris C compiler structure packing option
3. OSI position paper on SCO vs. IBM
5. It isn't about SCO vs IBM, it is about SCO vs Linux
6. Finding machine type from /dev/kmem in solaris 2.x
7. IBM's "Speed Start Your Linux Apps" initiative
8. GCC 2.7.2.1 on Solaris 2.5.1 (SPARC)
9. OS/2 vs. NT vs. Unix papers
10. Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] (sorry)
11. Fwd: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]
12. BENCHMARKS - SCO vs Solaris vs Unixware vs etc...