But hey, if you would rather have security issues that could lead to your
personal data being stolen, don't let me stop you.
Youre kidding right?Quote:> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane. Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
I can't sit in front of a Wincomp for more than 30 minutes without my eyes
tearing up. The fonts on Windows are absolutely HORRID!
I'm not kidding, they are really bad. Even before I knew about LGX that
was one of my major complaints about Windows. Nothing helped, I bought
anti-glare screen protectors, I installed custom fonts, I adjusted
contrast and brightness and still they would bother me to the point that
my eyes would twitch after too long in front of the screen without a
break.
Anti-aliasing just aggravated the problem. Now, instead of being stark
and jagged, they were all muddy looking and *y at the edges!
Man, give me a nice LGX system with Xft and some freetype fonts with
anti-aliasing and RGB hinting enabled and I can go straight for HOURS
without my eyes bugging me! The fonts on my system look like they were
printed out of a book.
Sorry, maybe that was an issue a couple years ago, but modern versions of
LGX have this thing locked!
--
rapskat - 22:15:59 up 7 days, 10:10, 5 users, load average: 0.40, 0.31, 0.20
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
bureaucrat, n:
A politician who has tenure.
Not a reasonable tradeoff. I'll just adjust sizes and types and just figure
it's the (small) price I have to pay.
--Rod
--
Author of "Linux for Non-Geeks--Clear-eyed Answers for Practical Consumers"
and "Boring Stories from Uncle Rod." Both are available at
http://www.rodwriterpublishing.com/index.html
To reply by e-mail, take the extra "o" out of my e-mail address. It's to
confuse spambots, of course.
Perhaps you should consult an opthalmologist...
--
Friendly Fire isn't
Not at all. Fonts on Windows are literally a pain compared to my LGXQuote:>>> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
>>> damned migrane. Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
>>Youre kidding right?
>>I can't sit in front of a Wincomp for more than 30 minutes without my
>>eyes tearing up. The fonts on Windows are absolutely HORRID!
> Now you are just being silly.
Granted, some fonts are better than others on either platform, but
overall, the rendering is superior IMHO on LGX now.
--
rapskat - 08:42:34 up 7 days, 20:36, 5 users, load average: 0.36, 0.23, 0.17
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
I never deny, I never contradict. I sometimes forget.
-- Benjamin Disraeli, British PM, on dealing with the
Royal Family
-S
>> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
>> migrane. Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
> Good luck. And after you have all you're software
> installed and everything configured, don't forget to
> apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.
--
Man is a bundle of habits. Windows is a bundle of bad habits.
> >> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
> >> damned migrane. Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
> > Good luck. And after you have all you're software
> > installed and everything configured, don't forget to
> > apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.
> Then reinstall the OS and all the software because SP1 broke
> something real bad.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
--
Friendly Fire isn't
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:32:36 -0500,
>> >> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
>> >> damned migrane. Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
>> > Good luck. And after you have all you're software
>> > installed and everything configured, don't forget to
>> > apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.
>> Then reinstall the OS and all the software because SP1 broke
>> something real bad.
> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1. SP1 contained
> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
> technical preventions against that. Reinstalling the software without
> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.
It'll possiblt even make it dual-boot eX-Pee and eX-Pee, one of which
will crash all of the time. That, of course, will be a different kind
of crash than normally happens, and it will be up to the end user to
determine which is which. Most likely, if the they both boot at all,
the user won't be able to tell which one they don't need, will go to
microsoft.public.windowsxp.* for assistance and end up with a
completely unbootable system that a repair shop will charge to make
work again.
After a reinstall the user may find the old install is more stable than
the new one, will try to get rid of the new one and end up taking out
files important to both of them. As a plus, the registry shouldn't
suffer too much damage, and should at least make it practically all the
way through before doing a screen dump about missing files.
All of this is becasue Windoze is easy-peasy and is "ready for the
desktop"!
--
Windows XP encountered the following error:
The operation completed successfully.
Please Reboot to correct this.
>> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1. SP1 contained
>> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
>> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
>> technical preventions against that. Reinstalling the software without
>> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.
> could wiping the hard disk and installing Linux be construed as a "technical
> prevention"???
* Except if the replacement OS is an upgrade** to what came on the
machine in the first place.
** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a major
upgrade.
--
Aren't you glad you use linux? Don't you wish everybody did?
> >> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1. SP1 contained
> >> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
> >> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
> >> technical preventions against that. Reinstalling the software without
> >> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.
> > could wiping the hard disk and installing Linux be construed as a "technical
> > prevention"???
> Nothing angers The God of Redmond more than such sacrilege! Haven't you
> been keeping up? It's illegal to have anything other than the original
> OS on a machine.* So this would bring down fire and brimstone like
> you've never seen!
> * Except if the replacement OS is an upgrade** to what came on the
> machine in the first place.
> ** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
> eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a major
> upgrade.
Really? Every Optiplex that I've thrown a distro at just loved it! TheyQuote:>> ** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
>> eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a
>> major upgrade.
> History: Bought a Dell Optiplex from Boeing Surplus. Tried to install
> mandrake, and suse. Would not install. Are Dell's really 'standard' or
> do they have a 'deal'. Beware.
--
rapskat - 01:00:47 up 8 days, 12:55, 5 users, load average: 0.44, 0.58, 0.51
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing.
1. Dual boot Debian and XP "boot failure" using XP boot loader
Hi
I've installed debian on 4 logical (at least that's what i've told
cfdisk to do) partitions (should be sda9 to sda12 ??; my HW config is
120GB hd on promise uata controller, dvd on ide0 master [so for linux:
hda], cd-rw on ide1 master [so hdc]) and created a boot floppy from
which i've extracted the bootsector and placed it on my fat16 boot
partition (sda0 ?? [will Linux see my promise ata as scsi??]). Then
i've added the line c:\bootsect.lnx="Debian Linux" to XPs boot.ini.
Now i get the message "boot failure" when i select Linux from the XP
boot menu.
I guess the Linux boot loader is looking for the boot image (vmlinuz
??)?
Where is it? Or better, how can i tell this to 'bootsect.lnx' ;-)
Booting from my rescue floppy still works fine, also booting XP!
Thanx
magicpio
3. Dual boot XP / Linux wont boot into XP
4. Hub
5. How to use XP boot loader to boot Linux on a different hard disk
6. VPN between Windows and Linux
7. How can change the Solaris primary boot subsystem to boot Windows xp default?
8. suggestions for a VPN over the Internet
9. Pls Help - Lin Mandrake 8.0: delete boot loader, add boot line in Win XP, play sound
10. Newbie novice installed Grub on Redhat 7.3 with separate /boot partition, dual boot Windows XP
11. linux - windows xp pro - dual boot - boot.ini - bootsect.lnx failure
12. from Lilo get back to XP bootloader?
13. can't get back to windows xp