I am booting back to xp

I am booting back to xp

Post by Ryan » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 03:29:22



These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!
 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by cybea » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 03:54:30



> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

I find it funny how people would be so worried about a fonts that they will
go back to an OS that comes from a company that will leave 14 security
holes unpatched in the browser it wrote for the OS. I guess people would
rather haver their data stolen than admit that Linux really does not have
font issues.

But hey, if you would rather have security issues that could lead to your
personal data being stolen, don't let me stop you.

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by rapska » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 05:25:58


NEWS FLASH: After suffering severe blunt trauma to the head, Ryan uttered
the following...

Quote:> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

Youre kidding right?

I can't sit in front of a Wincomp for more than 30 minutes without my eyes
tearing up.  The fonts on Windows are absolutely HORRID!

I'm not kidding, they are really bad.  Even before I knew about LGX that
was one of my major complaints about Windows.  Nothing helped, I bought
anti-glare screen protectors, I installed custom fonts, I adjusted
contrast and brightness and still they would bother me to the point that
my eyes would twitch after too long in front of the screen without a
break.

Anti-aliasing just aggravated the problem.  Now, instead of being stark
and jagged, they were all muddy looking and *y at the edges!

Man, give me a nice LGX system with Xft and some freetype fonts with
anti-aliasing and RGB hinting enabled and I can go straight for HOURS
without my eyes bugging me!  The fonts on my system look like they were
printed out of a book.

Sorry, maybe that was an issue a couple years ago, but modern versions of
LGX have this thing locked!

--
rapskat -  22:15:59 up 7 days, 10:10,  5 users,  load average: 0.40, 0.31, 0.20
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
bureaucrat, n:
        A politician who has tenure.

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by Roodwri.. » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:39:59



> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

As a full-time writer that has to stare at the monitor all day long, I agree
that fonts could be better. But I'd give up stability, freedom from
viruses, software choice, programs I prefer, freedom from spyware and a
whole host of other advantages for those slightly better fonts.

Not a reasonable tradeoff. I'll just adjust sizes and types and just figure
it's the (small) price I have to pay.

--Rod

--
Author of "Linux for Non-Geeks--Clear-eyed Answers for Practical Consumers"
and "Boring Stories from Uncle Rod." Both are available at
http://www.rodwriterpublishing.com/index.html

To reply by e-mail, take the extra "o" out of my e-mail address. It's to
confuse spambots, of course.

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by paul cook » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:30:52



> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

what font rendering issues??? there are no font rendering issues now.

Perhaps you should consult an opthalmologist...

--
Friendly Fire isn't

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by Pierre de Ferma » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:32:36



> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

Good luck. And after you have all you're software
installed and everything configured, don't forget to
apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.
 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by rapska » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:44:30


NEWS FLASH: After suffering severe blunt trauma to the head, Sam Richards
uttered the following...

Quote:>>> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
>>> damned migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

>>Youre kidding right?

>>I can't sit in front of a Wincomp for more than 30 minutes without my
>>eyes tearing up.  The fonts on Windows are absolutely HORRID!

> Now you are just being silly.

Not at all.  Fonts on Windows are literally a pain compared to my LGX
desktop.

Granted, some fonts are better than others on either platform, but
overall, the rendering is superior IMHO on LGX now.

--
rapskat -  08:42:34 up 7 days, 20:36,  5 users,  load average: 0.36, 0.23, 0.17
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
I never deny, I never contradict.  I sometimes forget.
                -- Benjamin Disraeli, British PM, on dealing with the
                   Royal Family

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by S C Rigle » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:05:22



> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

I thought you already went back, Nymshifter?

-S

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by Sinister Midge » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:31:55




>> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a damned
>> migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

> Good luck. And after you have all you're software
> installed and everything configured, don't forget to
> apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.

Then reinstall the OS and all the software because SP1 broke something
real bad.

--
Man is a bundle of habits. Windows is a bundle of bad habits.

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by David Kastru » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:11:43



> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:32:36 -0500,


> >> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
> >> damned migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

> > Good luck. And after you have all you're software
> > installed and everything configured, don't forget to
> > apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.

> Then reinstall the OS and all the software because SP1 broke
> something real bad.

Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1.  SP1 contained
some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
technical preventions against that.  Reinstalling the software without
SP1 would be such a technical prevention.

--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by paul cook » Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:20:01



> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1.  SP1 contained
> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
> technical preventions against that.  Reinstalling the software without
> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.

could wiping the hard disk and installing Linux be construed as a "technical
prevention"???

--
Friendly Fire isn't

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by Sinister Midge » Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:41:13




>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:32:36 -0500,


>> >> These fscking font rendering issues in LGX are about to give me a
>> >> damned migrane.  Linux is not bad but come one fix the gui!

>> > Good luck. And after you have all you're software
>> > installed and everything configured, don't forget to
>> > apply the SP1 and all the other fixes and patches.

>> Then reinstall the OS and all the software because SP1 broke
>> something real bad.

> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1.  SP1 contained
> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
> technical preventions against that.  Reinstalling the software without
> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.

Well, unless one wipes it with something else before reinstalling, it
won't overwrite the important spyware that was put there by SP1 anyway.

It'll possiblt even make it dual-boot eX-Pee and eX-Pee, one of which
will crash all of the time. That, of course, will be a different kind
of crash than normally happens, and it will be up to the end user to
determine which is which. Most likely, if the they both boot at all,
the user won't be able to tell which one they don't need, will go to
microsoft.public.windowsxp.* for assistance and end up with a
completely unbootable system that a repair shop will charge to make
work again.

After a reinstall the user may find the old install is more stable than
the new one, will try to get rid of the new one and end up taking out
files important to both of them. As a plus, the registry shouldn't
suffer too much damage, and should at least make it practically all the
way through before doing a screen dump about missing files.

All of this is becasue Windoze is easy-peasy and is "ready for the
desktop"!

--
Windows XP encountered the following error:
 The operation completed successfully.
    Please Reboot to correct this.

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by Sinister Midge » Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:45:12




>> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1.  SP1 contained
>> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
>> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
>> technical preventions against that.  Reinstalling the software without
>> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.

> could wiping the hard disk and installing Linux be construed as a "technical
> prevention"???

Nothing angers The God of Redmond more than such sacrilege! Haven't you
been keeping up? It's illegal to have anything other than the original
OS on a machine.* So this would bring down fire and brimstone like
you've never seen!

* Except if the replacement OS is an upgrade** to what came on the
machine in the first place.

** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a major
upgrade.

--
Aren't you glad you use linux? Don't you wish everybody did?

 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by john bai » Sat, 19 Apr 2003 05:13:30





> >> Uh, you don't have the right to reinstall without SP1.  SP1 contained
> >> some changes in terms of service allowing Microsoft to remotely spy on
> >> your system and change stuff, and you are not allowed to take
> >> technical preventions against that.  Reinstalling the software without
> >> SP1 would be such a technical prevention.

> > could wiping the hard disk and installing Linux be construed as a "technical
> > prevention"???

> Nothing angers The God of Redmond more than such sacrilege! Haven't you
> been keeping up? It's illegal to have anything other than the original
> OS on a machine.* So this would bring down fire and brimstone like
> you've never seen!

> * Except if the replacement OS is an upgrade** to what came on the
> machine in the first place.

> ** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
> eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a major
> upgrade.

History:  Bought a Dell Optiplex from Boeing Surplus.  Tried to
install mandrake, and suse.  Would not install.  Are Dell's really
'standard' or do they have a 'deal'.  Beware.
 
 
 

I am booting back to xp

Post by rapska » Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:02:37


NEWS FLASH: After suffering severe blunt trauma to the head, john bailo
uttered the following...

Quote:>> ** What the maker calls an upgrade, not what is really an upgrade. So,
>> eX-Pee to 98 would be a violation even though it would really be a
>> major upgrade.

> History:  Bought a Dell Optiplex from Boeing Surplus.  Tried to install
> mandrake, and suse.  Would not install.  Are Dell's really 'standard' or
> do they have a 'deal'.  Beware.

Really?  Every Optiplex that I've thrown a distro at just loved it!  They
are good sturdy standard little systems.  I wish I had one now, I'd set it
up as a dedicated server.

--
rapskat -  01:00:47 up 8 days, 12:55,  5 users,  load average: 0.44, 0.58, 0.51
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.5 kernel 2.5.67 on a Pentium III (Coppermine)
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing.

 
 
 

1. Dual boot Debian and XP "boot failure" using XP boot loader

Hi
I've installed debian on 4 logical (at least that's what i've told
cfdisk to do) partitions (should be sda9 to sda12 ??; my HW config is
120GB hd on promise uata controller, dvd on ide0 master [so for linux:
hda], cd-rw on ide1 master [so hdc]) and created a boot floppy from
which i've extracted the bootsector and placed it on my fat16 boot
partition (sda0 ?? [will Linux see my promise ata as scsi??]). Then
i've added the line c:\bootsect.lnx="Debian Linux" to XPs boot.ini.

Now i get the message "boot failure" when i select Linux from the XP
boot menu.
I guess the Linux boot loader is looking for the boot image (vmlinuz
??)?
Where is it? Or better, how can i tell this to 'bootsect.lnx' ;-)

Booting from my rescue floppy still works fine, also booting XP!

Thanx

magicpio

2. bridge packet map anyone

3. Dual boot XP / Linux wont boot into XP

4. Hub

5. How to use XP boot loader to boot Linux on a different hard disk

6. VPN between Windows and Linux

7. How can change the Solaris primary boot subsystem to boot Windows xp default?

8. suggestions for a VPN over the Internet

9. Pls Help - Lin Mandrake 8.0: delete boot loader, add boot line in Win XP, play sound

10. Newbie novice installed Grub on Redhat 7.3 with separate /boot partition, dual boot Windows XP

11. linux - windows xp pro - dual boot - boot.ini - bootsect.lnx failure

12. from Lilo get back to XP bootloader?

13. can't get back to windows xp