NT provides flexibility and scalability... Linux does it better!

NT provides flexibility and scalability... Linux does it better!

Post by Cyber Lin » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00



The answers you see there came from PreSales Tech Support. Thay told me
that the FTP server and WWW server were not stock on NT 4.0.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"/" is the beginning "kill" is the end and "kill -HUP" is the reberth. init is
eturnal truth everlasting.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



> :  Note most Linux distribution come with the following software.

> : WWW Server                               Yes             No
> : FTP Server                               Yes             No

> : Just from this list it is evident that the FreeWare OS Linux Is more flexible
> : and compatible than Windows NT. It is also evident that the Os is much more
> : reliable and stable sense the Os does not need to be rebooted to add drivers.
> : This means less down time when upgrading unlike Windows NT.

> Windows NT Server 4.0 (OEM or retail) comes with both an FTP server and quite a decent WWW
> server. The FTP server is a dream to configure. The WWW server I haven't worked with.

> --
> Andre van Eyssen,
> Kaelos Computing.

> "One who is not wise himself cannot be well advised"
>                                      ---Machiavelli
>                                      The Prince s23

 
 
 

NT provides flexibility and scalability... Linux does it better!

Post by JEDI » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00



>The answers you see there came from PreSales Tech Support. Thay told me
>that the FTP server and WWW server were not stock on NT 4.0.

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>"/" is the beginning "kill" is the end and "kill -HUP" is the reberth. init is
>eturnal truth everlasting.


>------------------------------------------------------------------------------



>> :  Note most Linux distribution come with the following software.

>> : WWW Server                           Yes             No
>> : FTP Server                           Yes             No

>> : Just from this list it is evident that the FreeWare OS Linux Is more flexible
>> : and compatible than Windows NT. It is also evident that the Os is much more
>> : reliable and stable sense the Os does not need to be rebooted to add drivers.
>> : This means less down time when upgrading unlike Windows NT.

>> Windows NT Server 4.0 (OEM or retail) comes with both an FTP server and quite a decent WWW
>> server. The FTP server is a dream to configure. The WWW server I haven't worked with.

    ...a part of that $500 difference in price between NTS and NTW...

 
 
 

NT provides flexibility and scalability... Linux does it better!

Post by The Ed » Mon, 26 May 1997 04:00:00



        JEDI writes:


>>> Windows NT Server 4.0 (OEM or retail) comes with both an FTP server and quite a decent WWW
>>> server. The FTP server is a dream to configure. The WWW server I haven't worked with.

Multihomed FTP please? ;)
yes, the FTP is easy to configure, but limited in functionality compared
to unix ftpd (although warFTPd fills that hole for free, just complaining
because i really dislike IIS's ftpd)

Quote:>    ...a part of that $500 difference in price between NTS and NTW...

mostly licensing actually....
PWS does a decent job as a standalone web server.

Cliff

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
|  Visit the Edge            |   Cute .signature quote       |
|  http://www.wwa.com/~edge  |      Nothing good yet            |

-------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
 

NT provides flexibility and scalability... Linux does it better!

Post by Mark Jacks » Tue, 03 Jun 1997 04:00:00


: The answers you see there came from PreSales Tech Support. Thay told me
: that the FTP server and WWW server were not stock on NT 4.0.

Just curious, did you dial the 1-900 line for priority support?  Or did you
pay the $35 for priority support, per incident?

Or did you opt to wait 15+ minutes for "standard support" while the call
was billed to you?

This is one of the main reasons (besides not having the source) I dislike
MS op systems.