Very Computer

by **Sam Trenhol** » Mon, 29 Dec 1997 04:00:00

Quote:>Red Hat says their web ordering is secure, but the Netscape broken key
>(in 3.0.1) doesn't reassemble as it usually does for SSL connections.
>Anyone know what gives?

RedHat mirrors their enitre web server in a secure form:

https://www.redhat.com

- Sam

--
"You can...turn sadness into laughter" -- Sunscreem, _Love_U_More_

by **Kenneth R. Kinde** » Mon, 29 Dec 1997 04:00:00

Quote:> Red Hat says their web ordering is secure, but the Netscape broken key
> (in 3.0.1) doesn't reassemble as it usually does for SSL connections.
> Anyone know what gives? Is the traffic encrypted or not? I emailed Red
> Hat about it, but they've never responded to my emails before, so I'm not
> holding my breath.

IMHO, anything under 128 bits is insecure.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth R. Kinder

"Software development is caffeine, pizza, and gcc."
PGP FingerPrints: AC 63 8E FC 56 OC 6E F2 55 68 16 E4 07 62 12 32
------------------------------------------------------------------

by **Elliot L** » Tue, 30 Dec 1997 04:00:00

On 28 Dec 1997 23:40:33 GMT, Kenneth R. Kinder

>> Red Hat says their web ordering is secure, but the Netscape broken key
>> (in 3.0.1) doesn't reassemble as it usually does for SSL connections.
>> Anyone know what gives? Is the traffic encrypted or not? I emailed Red
>> Hat about it, but they've never responded to my emails before, so I'm not
>> holding my breath.

>IMHO, anything under 128 bits is insecure.

<Best NSA director's voice>
Yes, but let's tell the masses that they are secure using 40 bit keys.

-- Elliot
Will read UCE for food! Charge of only $500 per message received. ;-)

by **Kenneth R. Kinde** » Wed, 31 Dec 1997 04:00:00

> On 28 Dec 1997 23:40:33 GMT, Kenneth R. Kinder

> >> Red Hat says their web ordering is secure, but the Netscape broken key
> >> (in 3.0.1) doesn't reassemble as it usually does for SSL connections.
> >> Anyone know what gives? Is the traffic encrypted or not? I emailed Red
> >> Hat about it, but they've never responded to my emails before, so I'm not
> >> holding my breath.

> >IMHO, anything under 128 bits is insecure.
> <Best NSA director's voice>
> Yes, but let's tell the masses that they are secure using 40 bit keys.

Correction:

<Best Big Brother voice>
Yes, but let's tell the masses that they are secure using 40 bit keys.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth R. Kinder

"Software development is caffeine, pizza, and gcc."
PGP FingerPrints: AC 63 8E FC 56 OC 6E F2 55 68 16 E4 07 62 12 32
------------------------------------------------------------------

Very Computer

Red Hat Server Secure?

Red Hat Server Secure?

Red Hat Server Secure?

Red Hat Server Secure?

Red Hat Server Secure?