Very Computer

This is one humungous url I'm afraid:

http://www.gigaweb.com/marketing/home1.asp?q1=windows+2000+profession...

'And though Windows 2000 Server closed the reliability gap with all
 versions of Novell, Inc.?s NetWare, the latest Microsoft Corp. server
 operating system is still not as reliable as Unix. According to the
 respondents; Windows 2000 requires 300 percent more unnecessary reboots
 than Unix.'

--
Over 100 security bugs in Microsoft SW last year. An infamous
record. The worst offending piece of SW, by far, IIS. 2001 isn't
looking any better.

http://www.gigaweb.com/marketing/home1.asp?q1=windows+2000+profession...

Quote:

> 'And though Windows 2000 Server closed the reliability gap with all
>  versions of Novell, Inc.?s NetWare, the latest Microsoft Corp. server
>  operating system is still not as reliable as Unix. According to the
>  respondents; Windows 2000 requires 300 percent more unnecessary reboots
>  than Unix.'

Exactly what i, as a user of Windows 2000, have been claiming for very long
time.
Its actually a joke that some of the people surveyed regard W2K as a
realliable OS and compare how much more stable than Win95 it is.  "83 %
more reliable than Windows 95", "64% more reliable than NT".... This is a
JOKE... how can this OS even compare to ZX81 OS? :-)

Cheers