1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Karsten Kreh » Fri, 06 Jan 1995 07:15:36



copying a single large file I get

1.0.0         40.2 kB/s
1.1.0         41.5 kB/s
1.1.73        22.0 kb/s

from my single speed Mitsumi FX001.

For comparison:

MSDOS 6.2    125.0 kB/s

Any ideas on that? How fast are the other brands, i. e. sony?

How to change this?

regards,
--
Karsten Kreher

tel +49.(0)6151-719999
fax +49.(0)6151-719970

 
 
 

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Karsten Kreh » Fri, 06 Jan 1995 18:22:15


: copying a single large file I get

: 1.0.0         40.2 kB/s
: 1.1.0         41.5 kB/s
: 1.1.73        22.0 kb/s

: from my single speed Mitsumi FX001.

: MSDOS 6.2    125.0 kB/s

further investigation gives up to 90 kB/s under load?!?!?!?!?
(doing gzip -9r /tmp/junk/* on the other console)

how come? Why does cdrom i/o vary with cpu load by a factor of (minus!) four?
--
Karsten Kreher

tel +49.(0)6151-719999
fax +49.(0)6151-719970

 
 
 

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Karsten Kreh » Fri, 06 Jan 1995 19:22:12


root:~#umount /dev/cdrom
root:~#mount /dev/cdrom
root:~#time dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/dev/null bs=1200k count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
0.00user
0.06system
0:55.81
elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps

: 12 megs in just over 100 seconds; seems about right.

just compared it... as you see, I get 21.5 kB/sec (mind my bs=1.2 MB!).
Something seems to be majorly wrong.

Whereas a cp improves in performance when making the system busier by other
processes (see my other post), dd does not:
        20.1 kB/sec for one gzip -9 running,
        14.5 kB/sec for two gzip -9 running.

I'm baffled.

--
Karsten Kreher

tel +49.(0)6151-719999
fax +49.(0)6151-719970

 
 
 

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Jon Thackr » Fri, 06 Jan 1995 09:12:00


Quote:Karsten Kreher writes:
> copying a single large file I get
> 1.1.73        22.0 kb/s
> from my single speed Mitsumi FX001.

Eh? You must have a funny system -- I get ~ 120k per second still
with my (borrowed) single speed Mitsumi (the oldest one possible)

    froggy% time dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/dev/null bs=12000k count=1
    1+0 records in
    1+0 records out
    0.00u 5.60s 1:40.93 5.5%

12 megs in just over 100 seconds; seems about right.
This is on Linux 1.1.76.

Cheers,
Jon.
--
// Jon Thackray, Cambridge, England.      ><>


 
 
 

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Chris Wel » Sun, 08 Jan 1995 10:20:59


: Eh? You must have a funny system -- I get ~ 120k per second still
: with my (borrowed) single speed Mitsumi (the oldest one possible)
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I heard that. ;-)
Anyway, I also had no problem with the Mitsumi (before I lent
it out, Jon!).

Perhaps there's more than one controller around. Which
one are you using?

--
Christopher J. Wells
............................................................


. OS   :    Linux / Warp Of course!                        .
. Tel  :    +44 1342 714115 (home)                         .
.           +44 1883 626682 (work)                         .
............................................................

 
 
 

1.1.0 -> 1.1.73 halves mitsumi speed

Post by Colten Edwar » Sun, 08 Jan 1995 19:22:36


: from my single speed Mitsumi FX001.

Has anyone ever experienced any file corruption from the LU0002S drive??

Seems that when I copy a file over 1meg in size the file will corrupt.
If I repeatedly untar the file deleting the last file to be created on
disk I can eventually get all files from the tar file, but this is a pain
in the ass.. This occured under 1.09 and above... I use the following
tar command   tar zxvkf filename.tar    The k option doesn't allow
overwriting of previous files...

                                                Colten Edwards

 
 
 

1. mitsumi with1.1.18=ok, with 1.1.73=AAARRRGGG!

I just upgraded from 1.1.18 to 1.1.73, and I can't get my mitsumi drive
to mount anymore... It is detected fine during boot up, but when I try to
mount -t iso9660 /dev/mcd /cdrom (which
has worked fine until now), I get a "read only file system" type
message, and nothing happens... What am I doing wrong? Thanks...

Damian

2. Solaris 10 smf, where do i start?

3. Kernel Change Summary 1.1.72 -> 1.1.73

4. Realtime under SOLARIS 2.4

5. non-root ppp start in RedHat

6. Kernel change summary 1.1.73 -> 1.1.74

7. Is Sendmail working?

8. Kernel upgrade from 1.1.59 -> 1.1.73 Kills NFS

9. Kernel change summary 1.1.72 -> 1.1.73

10. PPP problems with 1.0.9 thru 1.1.73

11. 1.1.73 & IDE CD-ROM ???

12. gnu emacs 19.28/linux 1.1.73/X86Free-3.1: cursor is opaque