Glibc V2.1.2 or V2.1.3?

Glibc V2.1.2 or V2.1.3?

Post by Stuart Summervil » Sat, 15 Jan 2000 04:00:00



Hi there,

Any ideas as to why rpmfind.net have a listing of glibc V2.1.3 (distributed by
BlueSky (??)) when GNU are still only providing V2.1.2?

sTu.
________________________________________________________________________
Stuart Summerville                     NEC Australia Pty. Ltd.
ph: (+61 3) 9264-3090                  Integrated Comm Products (R&D)
fax:(+61 3) 9264-3841                  649-655 Springvale Road Mulgrave

 
 
 

Glibc V2.1.2 or V2.1.3?

Post by Paul Kimo » Sat, 15 Jan 2000 04:00:00


[Followups redirected.]


> Any ideas as to why rpmfind.net have a listing of glibc V2.1.3 (distributed by
> BlueSky (??)) when GNU are still only providing V2.1.2?

Perhaps it's glibc-2.1.3-pre1?  See some recent libc-alpha mailing
list archives at http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-01/ .

--


 
 
 

Glibc V2.1.2 or V2.1.3?

Post by Andreas Jaege » Sat, 15 Jan 2000 04:00:00


Quote:>>>>> Stuart Summerville writes:

 > Hi there,
 > Any ideas as to why rpmfind.net have a listing of glibc V2.1.3 (distributed by
 > BlueSky (??)) when GNU are still only providing V2.1.2?

glibc 2.1.3 is not released yet.  There's a first prerelease out
(called glibc-2.1.3pre1) but it's just for testing.  I would advise
to stay with 2.1.2.

We will announce 2.1.3 on the usual channels and upload it to
ftp.gnu.org when it's ready.

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger