SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

Post by Alexander Strau » Fri, 19 Apr 1996 04:00:00



Hi there,

I'm working woth Linux 1.3.x (1.3.88 at this time).

Everytime I call 'ps' with the user option (-u) or 'top',
which lists user dependent, too, the process dies getting a
FPE signal (floating point exception).

Has someone got a solution for this problem ?
I tried to trace the process hopefully to identify the problem,
but I didn't.

thanx Alexander Strauss

 
 
 

SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

Post by Mark Trancha » Fri, 19 Apr 1996 04:00:00



Quote:>Hi there,
>I'm working woth Linux 1.3.x (1.3.88 at this time).
>Everytime I call 'ps' with the user option (-u) or 'top',
>which lists user dependent, too, the process dies getting a
>FPE signal (floating point exception).
>Has someone got a solution for this problem ?
>I tried to trace the process hopefully to identify the problem,
>but I didn't.
>thanx Alexander Strauss

Try reading past posts! This has been answered LOADS of times.
Get procps-0.99a (but keep your old xload somewhere safe -
the new one segfaults on me.

Mark.

 
 
 

SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

Post by Thomas Quin » Fri, 19 Apr 1996 04:00:00



Quote:> I'm working woth Linux 1.3.x (1.3.88 at this time).
> Everytime I call 'ps' with the user option (-u) or 'top',
> which lists user dependent, too, the process dies getting a
> FPE signal (floating point exception).

You have not read the documentation. You have not been following
discussions in comp.os.linux.development.system nor in the
linux-kernel mailing list. So you should really not be using
a development kernel.

The solution to your problem is upgrading procps.

--

 
 
 

SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

Post by S J Mortim » Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:00:00




>>I'm working woth Linux 1.3.x (1.3.88 at this time).

>>Everytime I call 'ps' with the user option (-u) or 'top',
>>which lists user dependent, too, the process dies getting a
>>FPE signal (floating point exception).

Read Documentation/Changes in the kernel source.

Quote:>Try reading past posts! This has been answered LOADS of times.
>Get procps-0.99a

-Sam.
 
 
 

SIGFPE with 'top' or 'ps -u' -- why ???

Post by S J Mortim » Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:00:00





>>>I'm working woth Linux 1.3.x (1.3.88 at this time).

>>>Everytime I call 'ps' with the user option (-u) or 'top',
>>>which lists user dependent, too, the process dies getting a
>>>FPE signal (floating point exception).

>Read Documentation/Changes in the kernel source.

present in kernels 1.3.89+.

-Sam.

 
 
 

1. Limiting 'w', 'top' and 'ps'

Hi.

I'm just beginning to set up a machine running Red Hat Linux 6.0

What I would like to do is make it so people 'feel alone' on the box. What I
mean is when they type 'w' they only see their own sessions logged in; when
the type 'top' only their processes are mentioned (and likewise for 'ps'). I
know this is possible as I have seen it done; but just don't know how.

I'm hoping one of you guys does!

All the best,

Ollie

2. Leaving the machine on...

3. new Debian: where is 'ps' and 'top'?

4. Error Message while running INSMOD

5. How to hide from 'who', 'finger', 'ps' commands?

6. Mesa AZ Users Wanted

7. why aren't 'esc' ~ 'break' recognized?

8. HP Vectra VL5 and LINUX

9. Why can't I 'startx' except as 'root'?

10. 'top' output -> High CPU consumption when thread is in 'sleep' state

11. Has anyone ported 'top' or 'sps' to AIX ?

12. difference between 'buff' and 'cached' in top + free + /proc/memstat

13. should I trust 'free' or 'top'?