Very Computer

by **Dirk Walraven** » Tue, 04 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Hi,

I'm writing a kernel-module which should be notified whenever my
ethernetcard receives a frame (and it should get the frame also).
I don't want to hack a call to my module into some ethernet-card driver.
Isn't there a more generic way for me to register my module as
the receiver for ethernetframes. (And at the same time to unregister the
normal protocolstack in the linux kernel).

by **Zoran Cutur** » Wed, 05 Jul 2000 04:00:00

> Hi,

> I'm writing a kernel-module which should be notified whenever my
> ethernetcard receives a frame (and it should get the frame also).
> I don't want to hack a call to my module into some ethernet-card driver.
> Isn't there a more generic way for me to register my module as
> the receiver for ethernetframes. (And at the same time to unregister the
> normal protocolstack in the linux kernel).

Well Dirk,

how often do you want to ask this question?? Isn't it enough to post
it once? Wait until somebody answers it. It is very annoying reading
the same post over and over again.

Z

by **dirk.walrav..** » Wed, 05 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Quote:> Well Dirk,

> how often do you want to ask this question?? Isn't it enough to post
> it once? Wait until somebody answers it. It is very annoying reading
> the same post over and over again.

Like I already said in one of the previous one. The newsserver of our
university was giving me a serious headache. It always told me that my
post failed. Now it seems like they did got through.Our newsserver seems
to be using some kind of caching software that doesn't seem to work the
way it should. I appologized already for the inconvienience (see my
posts coming via the dejanews-system) and I'm sorry once more.

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

by **phil-news-nos..** » Thu, 06 Jul 2000 04:00:00

|> Well Dirk,
|>
|> how often do you want to ask this question?? Isn't it enough to post
|> it once? Wait until somebody answers it. It is very annoying reading
|> the same post over and over again.
|>
|
|
| Like I already said in one of the previous one. The newsserver of our
| university was giving me a serious headache. It always told me that my
| post failed. Now it seems like they did got through.Our newsserver seems
| to be using some kind of caching software that doesn't seem to work the
| way it should. I appologized already for the inconvienience (see my
| posts coming via the dejanews-system) and I'm sorry once more.

I only saw ONE copy of this question. It looked like:

# Path: rQdQ!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeeds.belnet.be!naxos.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!not-for-mail

# Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system
# Subject: capturing ethernetframes
# Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 12:43:25 +0200
# Organization: K.U.Leuven
# Lines: 8

# NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
# Mime-Version: 1.0
# Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
# Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
# X-Trace: naxos.belnet.be 962621005 27257 134.58.127.3 (3 Jul 2000 10:43:25 GMT)

# NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jul 2000 10:43:25 GMT
# X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
# X-Accept-Language: en

# X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
# Xref: rQdQ comp.os.linux.development.system:108412
#
# Hi,
#
# I'm writing a kernel-module which should be notified whenever my
# ethernetcard receives a frame (and it should get the frame also).
# I don't want to hack a call to my module into some ethernet-card driver.
# Isn't there a more generic way for me to register my module as
# the receiver for ethernetframes. (And at the same time to unregister the
# normal protocolstack in the linux kernel).

--
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | My current websites: linuxhomepage.com, ham.org
| phil (at) ipal.net +----------------------------------------------------