LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements

LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements

Post by Mike Fedy » Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:00:11



Hi,

I noticed that LFS support has made it into 2.5, but it's not on the status
list (http://kernelnewbies.org/status/latest.html).

IIRC there were some plans to add oplock support to smbfs (newbie alert:
linux smb client, oplocks are already in samba server).  Maybe that should
be tracked on the status too.

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

 
 
 

LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements

Post by Guillaume Boissier » Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:20:07


Quote:> I noticed that LFS support has made it into 2.5, but it's not on the status
> list (http://kernelnewbies.org/status/latest.html).

If it's useful for a lot of people, yes, it makes sense to put it there.
So I just added it to the latest update on the Web site (URL above).

Quote:> IIRC there were some plans to add oplock support to smbfs (newbie alert:
> linux smb client, oplocks are already in samba server).  Maybe that should
> be tracked on the status too.

If someone can provide me with a status for this, I'll add it as well.
Cheers,

-- Guillaume

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

 
 
 

LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements

Post by Urban Widmar » Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:10:07



> Hi,

> I noticed that LFS support has made it into 2.5, but it's not on the status
> list (http://kernelnewbies.org/status/latest.html).

> IIRC there were some plans to add oplock support to smbfs (newbie alert:
> linux smb client, oplocks are already in samba server).  Maybe that should
> be tracked on the status too.

Using the terminology from the status page I guess this could be the smbfs
list:

Alpha           smbfs: I/O rewrite, smbiod
Alpha           smbfs: Fcntl locking + smb oplock support
Alpha           smbfs: smbconnect for better fstab integration
Planning        smbfs: Readahead support (async readpage/writepage)
Planning        smbfs: Read/Write request merging

But won't the list become very long if every little driver included all
the planned changes? Not my problem I guess ...

Also I don't know if any of this will be ready to be merged within the 6
month limit mentioned in one of the early announcements.

Regarding the updated statuspage, it isn't the "Samba filesystem", it is
the SMB filesystem (usually smbfs, SMBFS, SMBfs and possibly other
variations).

/Urban

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

 
 
 

LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements

Post by Guillaume Boissier » Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:00:14


Quote:> Using the terminology from the status page I guess this could be the smbfs
> list:

> Alpha              smbfs: I/O rewrite, smbiod
> Alpha              smbfs: Fcntl locking + smb oplock support
> Alpha              smbfs: smbconnect for better fstab integration
> Planning   smbfs: Readahead support (async readpage/writepage)
> Planning   smbfs: Read/Write request merging

> But won't the list become very long if every little driver included all
> the planned changes? Not my problem I guess ...

Yes, I am trying to limit the status list to the big items so that it
stays readable for people.

Quote:> Also I don't know if any of this will be ready to be merged within the 6
> month limit mentioned in one of the early announcements.

Why don't we do this, if there is anything that gets close to inclusion
and you feel it is a big thing lots of people have been anxiously waiting
for, let me know and I'll put it in.

Quote:> Regarding the updated statuspage, it isn't the "Samba filesystem", it is
> the SMB filesystem (usually smbfs, SMBFS, SMBfs and possibly other
> variations).

Fixed, thanks.

-- Guillaume

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

 
 
 

1. smbfs and lfs (2.4.20)

today lost some files (moving from samba share -> linux) :(
after some searches on the net i found there is no lfs support for smbfs

is there a reason for this ?
and: is there a patch for 2.4.20 (i only found an old patch for 2.4.16)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

2. Strange keyboard layout problem in KDE

3. In search of Solaris 2.5 Netscape Navigator 3.0 plug ins

4. PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.62-AC1 (14/21) PNP

5. crc32 improvements for 2.5 [RESEND]

6. Serial Console issue with Multia/UDB

7. [PATCH] RAW & O_DIRECT improvements for 2.5.3pre6

8. syntax for .rhosts file

9. Any significant 2.5 improvements for standalone?

10. crc32 improvements for 2.5

11. crc32 improvements for 2.5, more optimizations

12. Large File Support (LFS >2GB) with RH6.2, glibc 2.1.3, 2.4.9

13. LFS support on Alpha Linux?