by Marc D Bumbl » Sun, 09 Mar 2003 21:30:09
Is anyone working on developing the Posix semaphores for Linux? Was a
decision or consensus developed concerning the Posix implementation
for use with multiple processes? Can someone provide a pointer to the
latest, most relevant discussion on this subject?
Thanks,
Marc
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
by Ulrich Dreppe » Sun, 09 Mar 2003 22:00:36
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/posix-option-groups.html#THREAD_PROC...
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+akse2ijCOnn/RHQRAherAKC+iETyDpb9z86YvvkZf/0/9fYsGwCguC2d
9Bbf1JhXJ5IvWUWDtARLTMg=
=wTeU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
1. POSIX semaphores ( a.k.a. sem_init(), sem_wait(), sem_post() ) on LINUX
Hello
Are the posix implementation of semaphores ( known as POSIX semaphores
) recursive on LINUX ?
In other words, if one thread calls sem_wait(); and then calls it
again, would it hang on itself ?
I am seeing such a symptom on my Red Hat LINUX 7.3/2.4.18-4smp.
Is there any way to make these recursive on LINUX ?
Thanks
- Shailesh
2. Host unknown ????????????????
3. Useability of POSIX (was: Novell plans for Unix)
5. any plans to form kfm to support posix-acls?
6. SUN Cluster versions and multiple boot from one disk
7. Role of Plans and Planning in Program Development
10. what's difference between Posix and non-posix
12. POSIX newbie: POSIX function calls
13. sem_init failed -1: 'Function not implemented'?