conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective

conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective

Post by Dana Lacost » Sat, 22 Dec 2001 23:50:14



Moving to linux-net because it's more appropriate there, don't you think?

it works fine for me.  Maybe you can give some more info on just
exactly what you're doing and what's failing?

# uname -r
2.4.16
# netstat -rn|grep 0.0.0.0
(edited :)
0.0.0.0         172.22.1.1      0.0.0.0         UG       40 0          0
eth0
# arp 172.22.1.1
Address      HWtype  HWaddress           Flags Mask  Iface
172.22.1.1   ether   00:60:97:05:91:3A   C           eth0
# ping 172.22.1.1
PING 172.22.1.1 (172.22.1.1): 56 octets data
64 octets from 172.22.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.4 ms
--- 172.22.1.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.4/0.4/0.4 ms

> -----Original Message-----

> Sent: December 21, 2001 08:43

> Subject: conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective

> Dear Mailing List,

> I'm having great problems with ARP. Frankly, kernel 2.4.16
> never gets the
> proper arp address of the next-hop-router, no matter what I try.

> My equipment:

> Suse 7.3 , kernel upgraded to 2.4.16
> 3com 3c509-b tx isapnp ethcard eth0
> msi-something geforce2mx 200
> sb16 isapnp
> thunderbird 1.2 ghz
> gigabyte 7ixe4 motherboard

> I can only ping the IP of the network card itself.

> Whenever I ping my nexthop router (ip: x.x.x.1) i get a pause of a few
> seconds, then a whole sequence of "Destination unreachable".
> Looking at the arp cache using "arp -a", I see that the arp cache is
> always incomplete (always KEEPS being incomplete).

> Any clue is greatly appreciated, but I do suspect that the
> kernel 2.4.16's
> ARP code is buggy since Win98 , win2k etc works flawlessly.

> Yours

> Alex

> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in

> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 
 
 

conclusion: arp.c *must* be (still) defective

Post by Alex » Sun, 23 Dec 2001 04:00:14



> Moving to linux-net because it's more appropriate there, don't you think?

Dana : That depends! I think it might be a "thingie" between
isa-plugandplay and arp.c/netcode .... its a isa-plugandplaycard....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/