> I've had some discussion with an ex-NVidia guy who was there while
> were doing the driver release.
> They wanted to dual GPL/BSD license the kernel part in the first
> then they realised they had a problem. They don't own the copyright
> that code themselves, nor do they have the right to redistribute specs
> all of the hardware without NDA, because it consists in part of
> 'IP blocks' (as hardware people call libraries). So in the end
> opened up as far as they were allowed by preexisting constraints.
> Remember, the hardware was not constructed with an open source driver
> mind. It's fairly easy to build hardware which can have open source
> drivers (you choose your IP block vendors carefully), but NVidia did
> that in the first place, and now they are stuck.
> So your belief about hardware is just plain false, unfortunately.
> free not to buy their hardware, but I don't think you are being fair
> them when they appear to have gotten the point of open source but been
> stymied by other vendors. NVidia do try hard to give you the right to
> their stuff with Linux, but there is only so far they can go.
> I expect if Linux makes them enough money, they might buy the rights
> don't have, and release the driver in full. But don't expect that to
> happen soon, because if you think proprietary software licenses can be
> expensive, you haven't seen hardware.
cleared this up to quite a few people.
GnuPG Fingerprint: 9357 F403 B0A1 E18D 86D5 2230 BB92 6D64 D516 0A94
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/